jhelm007 said:
I think the main argument I hear about these marketshare figures is that they are sales based. Sales figure are the most concrete and platform neutral metric I can think of, but they have this one flaw:
I have 5 macs (all working perfectly and productively). I haven't bought a mac since 2001. Meanwhile my university has upgraded its entire fleet (with very few exceptions involving loss of compatibility with newer hardware etc.) of windoze boxes twice since 2000.
Now by a sales point of view it is clear that Apple has done something wrong, but by a consumer point of view they are doing it right. That is just my two cents.... Discuss...
In Which case in the census (worldwide this is) we need another question.
"Which computer do you use:
[1] IBM PC Compatible/Windows
[2] Apple Macintosh
[3] ..."
Again, logistically—you can see why sales figures is the closest at this present moment we will get to knowing a kind of marketshare.
After all, with the iPod having something like an 80% marketshare of the portable Mp3 sector, is that figure accurate or not as well?
I'm not trying to down Apple here at all, I'm just trying to be realistic and cut through some of the marketing hype and conjecture and derive an honest appraisal of the situation.
Every statistic has a flaw and their biggest flaw is that just about everyone hates them when they don't swing in favour of your argument, product etc.
Looking at this at a deeper level, one could reason that PCs running Windows are bought as a tool—like a supercharged typewriter and filing system, where as Macs are more of an overarching solution as opposed to being a bit part in that solution. This one is hard to express, but put simply—people generally associated PCs as having no character and being that box in the corner, or the source of grief, or the deity that tells me how much of X we have in stock. Macs however adopt personas and therefore have increased value in that sense and are less disposable in that sense.
Sure, price of objects comes into play, but we all derive value of an object through many other subconscious means which we ascribe upon that object—and those reasons derived may conclude that a PC is more disposable since it is just a tool, and therefore can be bought in bulk too...
hard to explain what I am thinking exactly but there is some sense inside of me!
Vicky