Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dtravis7" data-source="post: 1013628" data-attributes="member: 8287">I have a friend (and I use that term loosely) who hates Intel Macs.&nbsp; Says the G3 and G4 are Superior.&nbsp; I tell him 2.5-3 hours to convert a video here for burning on my 2.1Ghz iMac G5, 3.5-4+ hours on my 1.5Ghz G4 and 22-25 minutes on the Intel C2D Mini.&nbsp; He says so what, the G4 is better even if it takes hours longer. It's not a race.&nbsp; I do work for people.&nbsp; they have no time to wait for my slow G4 to get the work done.&nbsp; I can do 4 videos for them and get them their work and get me my $$$ in the time the G5 iMac takes for ONE.&nbsp; People have lives.&nbsp; My friend does not seem to understand that computers for a lot of people need to get the job done and as fast as possible.&nbsp; Time is $$$.And to marty, remember one reason for the Intel Switch was because IBM could not even make a G5 that would run in a thin notebook computer and the G4 by then was way too slow.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="dtravis7, post: 1013628, member: 8287"] I have a friend (and I use that term loosely) who hates Intel Macs. Says the G3 and G4 are Superior. I tell him 2.5-3 hours to convert a video here for burning on my 2.1Ghz iMac G5, 3.5-4+ hours on my 1.5Ghz G4 and 22-25 minutes on the Intel C2D Mini. He says so what, the G4 is better even if it takes hours longer. It's not a race. I do work for people. they have no time to wait for my slow G4 to get the work done. I can do 4 videos for them and get them their work and get me my $$$ in the time the G5 iMac takes for ONE. People have lives. My friend does not seem to understand that computers for a lot of people need to get the job done and as fast as possible. Time is $$$. And to marty, remember one reason for the Intel Switch was because IBM could not even make a G5 that would run in a thin notebook computer and the G4 by then was way too slow. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Name this item 🌈