- Joined
- Jan 31, 2008
- Messages
- 195
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 18
Interesting ...I can't agree with this. You can make certain arguments regarding OS X having a better workflow, but Vista is not a slow OS if you're on relatively recent hardware. Just like OS X! Both Vista and Leopard basically require computers no more than 2-3 years old to run very well, and they both start to bog down when you try to use them on older computers.
In terms of things like video encoding, applying filters and effects in Photoshop, FPS when rendering 3D images or games, or any other demanding activity, the OS has virtually nothing to do with performance. The faster computer will win regardless of what OS it happens to be running.
I'm not saying that Macs are worthless or anything but people here seem to have this notion that they're perfect and have superhuman (or I guess supercomputer) capabilities, and it's just not true. The only difference between a Mac and a Windows PC is the OS. So yes, there's some good software, but calculations take a certain amount of time no matter what software you're using.
I have a 3-year old PC with both WinXP and Linux installed on it, and tasks running in Linux run much faster than similar tasks running in WinXP on that machine. With Vista it would be no contest. So I still say the OS has a lot to do with performance.
I would be interested to know how fast Vista runs on a Mac (using Boot Camp) versus OS X running on the same Mac. I honestly don't know the answer to that question because I can't install Windows on my old iMac. But my guess is that OS X would run faster.