I'm stuck between these two. I'm not very computer-savvy in terms of the specs so if anyone could clarify which of these is better, that would be great.
13-inch: 2.8 GHz
2.8GHz dual-core
Intel Core i7
4GB 1333MHz
750GB 5400-rpm1
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Built-in battery (7 hours)2
$1,499.00
15-inch: 2.2 GHz
2.2GHz quad-core
Intel Core i7
4GB 1333MHz
500GB 5400-rpm1
Intel HD Graphics 3000
AMD Radeon HD 6750M with 512MB GDDR5
Built-in battery (7 hours)2
$1,799.00
Is the 2.2GHz quad-core better than the 2.8GHz dual-core? Will the addition of the AMD Radeon graphics card make a huge difference when it come to running something like games on the computer? Although the 2 inch larger display seems nice, it's more of a luxury that I don't necessarily need so if the 13" outperforms the 15" I don't mind having a slightly smaller display.
13-inch: 2.8 GHz
2.8GHz dual-core
Intel Core i7
4GB 1333MHz
750GB 5400-rpm1
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Built-in battery (7 hours)2
$1,499.00
15-inch: 2.2 GHz
2.2GHz quad-core
Intel Core i7
4GB 1333MHz
500GB 5400-rpm1
Intel HD Graphics 3000
AMD Radeon HD 6750M with 512MB GDDR5
Built-in battery (7 hours)2
$1,799.00
Is the 2.2GHz quad-core better than the 2.8GHz dual-core? Will the addition of the AMD Radeon graphics card make a huge difference when it come to running something like games on the computer? Although the 2 inch larger display seems nice, it's more of a luxury that I don't necessarily need so if the 13" outperforms the 15" I don't mind having a slightly smaller display.