G5 vs Intel-based: what is the heat like in comparison?

M

MacHeadCase

Guest
Just out of curiosity, I was wondering if someone in the membership can compare the heat created by an iMac PowerPC G5 vs an Intel iMac.

Before the G5 iMac, I had a G4 iLamp iMac and quite frankly I never noticed any heat coming out of it. When I got my G5 I noticed heat radiating from the screen but, in the light of why Apple never made any G5 laptops, I would expect it's nothing excessive and it's quite normal with the G5 chip.

A friend wants to switch from a Windoze box to an iMac and we're going to the Apple Store so she can play around with the iMac, check them out, etc. In her leisure time she plays music (guitar and bass) and would love to be able to use her iMac for that: she will first try out GarageBand if she goes ahead with the purchase then she'll want something more sophisticated.

Oops! I'm going off topic with my own thread! LOL

Anyway just for my own knowledge I was curious about the heat thing: I did notice some threads in here where members say the MacBook and MBP laptops get pretty hot and uncomfortable so I would guess Intel-based Macs radiate heat as well?

Thanks for your input, gang!
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
1,814
Reaction score
137
Points
63
Location
NY USA
Your Mac's Specs
iMac 5.1 | iMac 7.1 | iMac 12.1 | iMac 19.1 | iPhone 11 Pro | Watch s5
Being that G5s are old technology already, and the Intels are newer, by theory they must be more efficient and therefore make less heat per horse power.

My iMac has NEVER burned my lap. I barely feel the heat from it on my legs :D Then again, it might be the table in the way...
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2004
Messages
12,455
Reaction score
603
Points
113
Location
PA
Your Mac's Specs
MacBook
Being that G5s are old technology already, and the Intels are newer, by theory they must be more efficient and therefore make less heat per horse power.
Old is a little harsh. :)
Previous technology is more fitting. G5's are by no means "old".

And, though I caught your tounge in cheek reply....

As far as "newer = better", that is not always the case.
Bigger, Faster, Newer does not necessarily equate to "Better" or "more Efficient".

To answer the question, in my experience with using both PPC machines as well as Intels, the Intels have always ran hotter. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, but they do run much hotter than any PPC machine I have come across.
 
M

MacHeadCase

Guest
Ok thanks for your thoughts. Now I know that His Steveness, saying he ditched IBM because they weren't able to come up with a G5 chip for laptops because of the heat issue is a lie.

*Sniffles* My heart is broken because Our Leader has lied to us. *Sob* :'(





;D
 

dtravis7


Retired Staff
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
30,133
Reaction score
703
Points
113
Location
Modesto, Ca.
Your Mac's Specs
MacMini M-1 MacOS Monterey, iMac 2010 27"Quad I7 , MBPLate2011, iPad Pro10.5", iPhoneSE
MHC, I have the same machine you have, the 2.1Ghz iMac G5. I agree that the heat from the back is not that bad. I have messed with the Core Duo iMacs but never really checked the heat. My core duo Mac Mini though runs quite a bit hotter than my G4 mini does if that tells you anything. I have a feeling that DB is correct on his points. Also the Intel is Dual Core where your and my iMacs are not. I have never felt the iMac G5 ran really hot. They did a good job with the cooling system. This G5 iMac has been one of the most reliable computers that I have ever owned.
 
M

MacHeadCase

Guest
Oh yeah for sure! It's a little work horse and even though I've had it for almost 18 months, I'm still not finding it slow.

I love my iMac. :*
 
Joined
Feb 5, 2007
Messages
465
Reaction score
19
Points
18
Your Mac's Specs
iMac 20" C2D 2.4 ghz 2gb iMac 20" C2D 2GB 256MB Graphics Macbook C2D 2GB Powermac G4 Dual 450
i use my iMac to its fullest potential and i never even hear the fans getting louder...and i put my hand on the back and it feels like...an early summer morning....and when i use my friend's G5, under normal pressure it is fine, but when playing a DVD, roller coaster tycoon, or rendering effects in iMovie, the thing starts to get loudddd...and theres tons of heat radiating from that little slit in the back
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
1,814
Reaction score
137
Points
63
Location
NY USA
Your Mac's Specs
iMac 5.1 | iMac 7.1 | iMac 12.1 | iMac 19.1 | iPhone 11 Pro | Watch s5
Old is a little harsh. :)
Previous technology is more fitting. G5's are by no means "old".

And, though I caught your tounge in cheek reply....

As far as "newer = better", that is not always the case.
Bigger, Faster, Newer does not necessarily equate to "Better" or "more Efficient".

To answer the question, in my experience with using both PPC machines as well as Intels, the Intels have always ran hotter. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, but they do run much hotter than any PPC machine I have come across.

The G5 came out in 04.

I wasn't being 'wise' or snobby about newer=better. I was being sincere about technology.

The dual 2.5 G5 had to be water cooled. I don't know of any water cooled intels of any speed.

Now I know that His Steveness, saying he ditched IBM because they weren't able to come up with a G5 chip for laptops because of the heat issue is a lie.

*Sniffles* My heart is broken because Our Leader has lied to us. *Sob* :'(

Does my observation clear Steve for you?
 
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
32
Reaction score
2
Points
8
Location
Louisville, KY
Your Mac's Specs
2ghz Core 2 Duo Imac 1GB ram Superdrive
All I know is that in my old 20" G5 I could hear it on.. and the fan start up.

My new core2duo 17" I can't hear a thing. This computer is virtually silent!
 
M

MacHeadCase

Guest
*Snip*
Does my observation clear Steve for you?

Kinda. Guess it's safe to trust him again. :D

Giulio, I almost clicked on your Ajax button instead of clicking on the M-F quote button! LOL

And thanks for your input guys! Much appreciated. :)
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2007
Messages
313
Reaction score
7
Points
18
Hello, I can't speak for G5 vs C2D but, in the pc world liquid cooling and the such came to be mostly to keep cheaper/hotter running AMD processors cool, Intel procs are always recommended when cooling is an issue. I have an 20" iMac G5 and the only time I ever hear the fans is during heavy video use.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2007
Messages
313
Reaction score
7
Points
18
absolutely, I tried out some intel iMacs and so far I think the G5 is faster. I expect/hope that to change when Leopard comes out.
 
Joined
Dec 3, 2006
Messages
9,383
Reaction score
417
Points
83
Location
Irvine, CA
Your Mac's Specs
Black Macbook C2D 2GHz 3GB RAM 250GB HD iPhone 4 iPad 3G
Ok, there seems to be quite a bit of confusion and mis-information in this thread.

For starters, let's debunk the Intel=hot thing. Yes, back during the Pentium 4 days, Intel processors ran hot, more so with the last revisions because of the Prescott core (lovingly called the Preshott). The thing was just inefficient and suffered from major heat issues.

However, Intel has revamped its processor architecture with the Conroe cores (CoreDuo/Core2Duo). These processors are far more efficient than their Netburst predecessors. They also run MUCH faster despite the lower clockspeed. They are also much cooler than the older Pentiums.

One last thing I wanted to point out is jakeroberts' claim that AMD processors run hotter than Intel. That simply isn't true, at least it hasn't been for quite some time. Back during the Athlon XP days with the Thunderbird core, the AMD processors ran hot. But with the Bartons and then subsequently with the arrival of Athlon64 processors, heat simply has not been an issue with AMD's line of processors. In fact, this was touted as one of the many reasons why one should avoid an Intel Pentium 4 processor.

Steve Jobs wasn't lying when he said the G5 processor ran too hot to put into a laptop. Like Giulio said, the things ran so hot that Apple had to water cool them. Also, IBM had essentially thrown in the towel for making chips for Apple since it was getting bids from Microsoft and Sony to build them chips for their upcoming consoles, which would have made them FAR more money than selling chips to Apple.

SO, to conclude, the Core2Duo processors run both faster and cooler than the G5 processors :)
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
1,814
Reaction score
137
Points
63
Location
NY USA
Your Mac's Specs
iMac 5.1 | iMac 7.1 | iMac 12.1 | iMac 19.1 | iPhone 11 Pro | Watch s5
Giulio, I almost clicked on your Ajax button instead of clicking on the M-F quote button! LOL

Hm... that gets me thinking... perhaps I should make a button that says "Send negative Rep". That'll boost my web site stats!
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2007
Messages
313
Reaction score
7
Points
18
I did a poor job of explaining the AMD thing, they are a lot better than they used to be. I have read some articles in maximum pc that claim the amd's still run hotter than the intel's do. As far as speed right now to me anyway, the G5s feel faster, but I think that will change when Leopard comes out as it is being written with the Intel processors in mind.
 
Joined
Dec 3, 2006
Messages
9,383
Reaction score
417
Points
83
Location
Irvine, CA
Your Mac's Specs
Black Macbook C2D 2GHz 3GB RAM 250GB HD iPhone 4 iPad 3G
I don't know which edition of Maximum PC you were reading, but AMDs have been running cooler than Intel processors for a solid 4 years now. It was only with the release of Conroe last summer where heat has stopped being as big of a problem as it used to be.

As for the G5s "feeling" faster, are you referring to the operating system itself or applications?
 

dtravis7


Retired Staff
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
30,133
Reaction score
703
Points
113
Location
Modesto, Ca.
Your Mac's Specs
MacMini M-1 MacOS Monterey, iMac 2010 27"Quad I7 , MBPLate2011, iPad Pro10.5", iPhoneSE

That of course is Booting speed and NOT CPU speed in getting work done, although the Intel Mini does get real work done faster than my 2.1Ghz iMac G5. Handbrake doing the exact same video takes 2.5 hours on the iMac G5 with CPU set to Max Performance and less than 55 minutes on Core Duo Mini. There is no doubt using Universal applications on both systems that the Intel Macs are faster than the G5's overall at least with every app I have compared over here.

I have done that same bootup test here and my Core Duo Mini boots that fast but my iMac G5 iSight does not take anywhere near that long to boot to the desktop. The Core Duo Mini does BOOT 2x faster than my iMac G5 though.

The iMac G5 in that comparison needs some cleaning up as it's way slower booting to the desktop than it should be.
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top