- Joined
- Apr 20, 2006
- Messages
- 2,255
- Reaction score
- 47
- Points
- 48
- Your Mac's Specs
- Al iMac 20" 2.4Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo
The screens are widescreen remember, so in effect you have a tall, thin browser window. Stretching it widthways will just create two white bands on either side.
Everybody used to cope fine with 14" monitors in the old days, but OS X in particular makes good use of massive monitors because it's geared towards switching back and forth between different apps and keeping them all visible for easy switching.
I think it's a designer think. PC people used to sit and work on Word for hours, and maybe switch to Excel after lunch or whatever. But designers need to design a logo in Illustrator for example, quickly switch to Quark, place and adjust and then do some tweaks in Photoshop. Switching to one screen each is limiting - you need to compare two windows side by side often.
I don't think even Vista is much different in its approach than XP and so is wasteful if it's using a widescreen monitor.
Everybody used to cope fine with 14" monitors in the old days, but OS X in particular makes good use of massive monitors because it's geared towards switching back and forth between different apps and keeping them all visible for easy switching.
I think it's a designer think. PC people used to sit and work on Word for hours, and maybe switch to Excel after lunch or whatever. But designers need to design a logo in Illustrator for example, quickly switch to Quark, place and adjust and then do some tweaks in Photoshop. Switching to one screen each is limiting - you need to compare two windows side by side often.
I don't think even Vista is much different in its approach than XP and so is wasteful if it's using a widescreen monitor.