The Wikipedia debate

[bryphotoguy]

Right Life, that is what I was going to say. A voting system is a bad idea. Anyone could vote on everything. I visit Wikipedia to learn. If I am expected to vote on something I learned 2 minutes ago, my thoughts might not accurately depict the quality of the article.

 

[Chimpur]

Another way to validate actual content might be to have experts in th fields to comment on the articles

 

[lifeafter2am]

Another way to validate actual content might be to have experts in th fields to comment on the articles

In theory it would work, but it would make a lot of work for Wikipedia. Then you could have the debate on whether a certain person is actually an accepted expert in the field. Then you would have to have a rating system to rate the experts that rate the articles. ;D lol.

 

[bryphotoguy]

Assuming these experts will want to take time out of their day to read all this and rate it Pro Bono.

 

[Brown Study]

Then you would have to have a rating system to rate the experts that rate the articles. ;D lol.

They'd all end up arguing over the number of green dots.

 

[lifeafter2am]

They'd all end up arguing over the number of green dots.

LOL!!!!