- Joined
- Feb 2, 2004
- Messages
- 12,455
- Reaction score
- 604
- Points
- 113
- Location
- PA
- Your Mac's Specs
- MacBook
Fair Use isn't really that vague.I live in University housing and am surrounded by law students, I called up my neighbor and he said that fair use laws are very vague.
The purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered “fair,” are criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.The 1961 Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the U.S. Copyright Law said:examples of activities that courts have regarded as fair use: “quotation of excerpts in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment; quotation of short passages in a scholarly or technical work, for illustration or clarification of the author's observations; use in a parody of some of the content of the work parodied; summary of an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report; reproduction by a library of a portion of a work to replace part of a damaged copy; reproduction by a teacher or student of a small part of a work to illustrate a lesson; reproduction of a work in legislative or judicial proceedings or reports; incidental and fortuitous reproduction, in a newsreel or broadcast, of a work located in the scene of an event being reported."
Source
If someone was attempting to clarify or drive home an idea to you and used your photo to do so, then he is technically within his rights to do so under Fair Use. It is obvious that in the context of this thread, it was used to illustrate a concept, and not used for any illegal activity or personal gain.