Forums
New posts
Articles
Product Reviews
Policies
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Apple Computing Products:
macOS - Operating System
Yet Another *Panic Attack* using OSX 10.6.8
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MacDulles" data-source="post: 1611476" data-attributes="member: 334921"><p>What I have learned is that there is *no* laymen's code identification corresponding to * problem* or *error source. It's all couched in binary relative language that offers no *clear* value judgement of errant code flagging </p><p>that designates the presence of a *known* kernal panic trigger already on path. To my right-brained/left-handed mind</p><p>can't *known* code paths to disaster be traced with more illustrary code-pattern indentifiers., warning flags that alert a debugger program which already is programmed to *know* what to hunt down as errant kernal panic triggers that, if followed to their conclusion , will trigger kernal panic. And if my attempt at description reads as so much tortured English gobbilty-gook then please feel my pain over poor defining of what amounts to Martian code to me.</p><p> Makes me wish that I could let a cursor hover over any line of code and wait for some defining passage, or link to one , to appear in a window just beneath it . ( ie: If you see this here then that may mean possible trouble leading to a kernal panic crash-path) I believe you get my plain layman's English drift.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MacDulles, post: 1611476, member: 334921"] What I have learned is that there is *no* laymen's code identification corresponding to * problem* or *error source. It's all couched in binary relative language that offers no *clear* value judgement of errant code flagging that designates the presence of a *known* kernal panic trigger already on path. To my right-brained/left-handed mind can't *known* code paths to disaster be traced with more illustrary code-pattern indentifiers., warning flags that alert a debugger program which already is programmed to *know* what to hunt down as errant kernal panic triggers that, if followed to their conclusion , will trigger kernal panic. And if my attempt at description reads as so much tortured English gobbilty-gook then please feel my pain over poor defining of what amounts to Martian code to me. Makes me wish that I could let a cursor hover over any line of code and wait for some defining passage, or link to one , to appear in a window just beneath it . ( ie: If you see this here then that may mean possible trouble leading to a kernal panic crash-path) I believe you get my plain layman's English drift. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Name this item 🌈
Post reply
Forums
Apple Computing Products:
macOS - Operating System
Yet Another *Panic Attack* using OSX 10.6.8
Top