Forums
New posts
Articles
Product Reviews
Policies
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
Switcher Hangout (Windows to Mac)
xbench results....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Joeytpg" data-source="post: 42641"><p>Hi guys, i have a simple question......</p><p></p><p>today i installed a 512mb ram chip in my 15" 1.33ghz powerbook..........so.....i had 256 as normal.........and now i have 768.............and even when it seem faster (i still have to test it more with daily use) but even when it seems faster i tested with xbench and the results with 256 ram where better than with 768................</p><p></p><p>with the stock 256 it was 116.68, and with 768 i test it 3 times: 1) 108, but i had a few application opened, so i closed them and tested it again....and 115 was the best one.............so 115 after upgrading ram?......and 116.68 with only 256 stock?............anything wrong?.....or is this normal</p><p></p><p></p><p>now i have more things in my hard drive (more videos and mp3's and programs ......than before) but i don't think that's a problem.</p><p></p><p></p><p>thanks for inputs <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>Update: it is faster.......but i don't know why the xbench came out worst than with the stock 256.</p><p></p><p>P.S. by the way the memory brand i bought was CENTON ELECTRONICS <a href="http://www.centon.com" target="_blank">www.centon.com</a> is this good?...</p><p></p><p>i know crucial is the most recommended here but i asked an uncle so buy the memory at compusa and he got that one (the guy from the store told him that it was compatible with Apple)....</p><p></p><p>...and since i told him to get PC2700 and gave him every little detail....well it's working because my pbook inmediatly recognized it</p><p></p><p>what do you think about CENTON?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Joeytpg, post: 42641"] Hi guys, i have a simple question...... today i installed a 512mb ram chip in my 15" 1.33ghz powerbook..........so.....i had 256 as normal.........and now i have 768.............and even when it seem faster (i still have to test it more with daily use) but even when it seems faster i tested with xbench and the results with 256 ram where better than with 768................ with the stock 256 it was 116.68, and with 768 i test it 3 times: 1) 108, but i had a few application opened, so i closed them and tested it again....and 115 was the best one.............so 115 after upgrading ram?......and 116.68 with only 256 stock?............anything wrong?.....or is this normal now i have more things in my hard drive (more videos and mp3's and programs ......than before) but i don't think that's a problem. thanks for inputs :D Update: it is faster.......but i don't know why the xbench came out worst than with the stock 256. P.S. by the way the memory brand i bought was CENTON ELECTRONICS [url]www.centon.com[/url] is this good?... i know crucial is the most recommended here but i asked an uncle so buy the memory at compusa and he got that one (the guy from the store told him that it was compatible with Apple).... ...and since i told him to get PC2700 and gave him every little detail....well it's working because my pbook inmediatly recognized it what do you think about CENTON? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
Switcher Hangout (Windows to Mac)
xbench results....
Top