Forums
New posts
Articles
Product Reviews
Policies
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Apple Products
Apple Watch
Warning - For Affected Canadian Drivers and iWatch (and iDevice) wearers and users
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MacInWin" data-source="post: 1800610" data-attributes="member: 396914"><p>@Reineyrooster, I'm not familiar with Canadian laws, but in the US, there are primary and secondary traffic offenses. Police only stop cars for primary offenses, but then can write additional citations for secondary offenses. For example, if you have your seat belt not in use, that is, in most locales, a secondary offense, so you won't be stopped for that. But if you are stopped for speeding, a primary offense, and then the policeman sees your seat belt is not in use, you can get a ticket for that as well as the speeding.</p><p></p><p>So, in the case of the young woman who didn't move when the light turned green, what was the primary offense? Does Canadian law require you to move when the light turns green? What if she was trying to sort out some problem with an unruly child in a car seat, would she have to abandon the child to move because the light was green? </p><p></p><p>I ask because if the primary offense was the watch use, then I stand where I originally posted, that there are cars that cannot be driven in Canada the way the law is written.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MacInWin, post: 1800610, member: 396914"] @Reineyrooster, I'm not familiar with Canadian laws, but in the US, there are primary and secondary traffic offenses. Police only stop cars for primary offenses, but then can write additional citations for secondary offenses. For example, if you have your seat belt not in use, that is, in most locales, a secondary offense, so you won't be stopped for that. But if you are stopped for speeding, a primary offense, and then the policeman sees your seat belt is not in use, you can get a ticket for that as well as the speeding. So, in the case of the young woman who didn't move when the light turned green, what was the primary offense? Does Canadian law require you to move when the light turns green? What if she was trying to sort out some problem with an unruly child in a car seat, would she have to abandon the child to move because the light was green? I ask because if the primary offense was the watch use, then I stand where I originally posted, that there are cars that cannot be driven in Canada the way the law is written. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Apple Products
Apple Watch
Warning - For Affected Canadian Drivers and iWatch (and iDevice) wearers and users
Top