Forums
New posts
Articles
Product Reviews
Policies
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Digital Lifestyle
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
Thinking Of Getting Into Digital Photography
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Odin_aa" data-source="post: 425057" data-attributes="member: 11814"><p>Thats not what we said. You brought up the full frame (5D and 1D series cameras) not the xti.</p><p></p><p>The Xti or for that matter any of the other 1.6x crop sensor canons do not outperform the nikon consumer DSLR's for high ISO performance. If your shooting JPEG, it will depend on the cameras noise reduction in camera...some models may be more effective in noise reduction in camera however if your shooting raw they all suffer from the same physical flaw of cramming too many pixels on the sensor to not have high ISO issues.</p><p></p><p>Some DSLR's allow (when shooting JPEG) the photographer to choose a level of noise reduction and others do not. Have one of the D40 shooters here post an image taken at ISO 800 or 1600 and someone eith an xti do the same. Problem is you will have no idea if the JPEG has been altered with photoshop or what the in camera settings were without full EXIF information, ideally the shopper would get to take side by side shots in both JPEG and RAW with the different in camera options available and look for themselves too see what the camera produces.</p><p></p><p>For me, true statement would be that "Pro Canon DSLR's out perform other 35mm DSLR's for high ISO performance"</p><p></p><p>Another true statement would be "Canon and Nikon consumer DSLR's have similar high ISO performance"</p><p></p><p>That is from my experience looking at RAW and JPEG images (Full size) from various Canon and Nikon models. I have not had the opportunity to see the Fuji S5 raw or jpegs other than shots others have posted on the web.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Odin_aa, post: 425057, member: 11814"] Thats not what we said. You brought up the full frame (5D and 1D series cameras) not the xti. The Xti or for that matter any of the other 1.6x crop sensor canons do not outperform the nikon consumer DSLR's for high ISO performance. If your shooting JPEG, it will depend on the cameras noise reduction in camera...some models may be more effective in noise reduction in camera however if your shooting raw they all suffer from the same physical flaw of cramming too many pixels on the sensor to not have high ISO issues. Some DSLR's allow (when shooting JPEG) the photographer to choose a level of noise reduction and others do not. Have one of the D40 shooters here post an image taken at ISO 800 or 1600 and someone eith an xti do the same. Problem is you will have no idea if the JPEG has been altered with photoshop or what the in camera settings were without full EXIF information, ideally the shopper would get to take side by side shots in both JPEG and RAW with the different in camera options available and look for themselves too see what the camera produces. For me, true statement would be that "Pro Canon DSLR's out perform other 35mm DSLR's for high ISO performance" Another true statement would be "Canon and Nikon consumer DSLR's have similar high ISO performance" That is from my experience looking at RAW and JPEG images (Full size) from various Canon and Nikon models. I have not had the opportunity to see the Fuji S5 raw or jpegs other than shots others have posted on the web. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Digital Lifestyle
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
Thinking Of Getting Into Digital Photography
Top