Forums
New posts
Articles
Product Reviews
Policies
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Community Information Center
Community Suggestions and Feedback
smiles
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="muso" data-source="post: 54390" data-attributes="member: 40"><p>I agree, there are a some traditional-type smilies missing. We could add in some of the old ones, but personally I would prefer to have a consistent look rather than cover all possible smilies. We've done our best to map the old codes to the new smilies and its the result of this that some of the codes (eg <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />) don't really correspond to images that accurately portray the intended emotion. Once again, I figured this would be better than having stray "<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />" text displaying in older posts. </p><p></p><p>Perhaps we could change some of the codes to not display an image at all (e.g. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />, <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />) - I'd like to hear more opinions on this.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="muso, post: 54390, member: 40"] I agree, there are a some traditional-type smilies missing. We could add in some of the old ones, but personally I would prefer to have a consistent look rather than cover all possible smilies. We've done our best to map the old codes to the new smilies and its the result of this that some of the codes (eg :rolleyes:) don't really correspond to images that accurately portray the intended emotion. Once again, I figured this would be better than having stray ":rolleyes:" text displaying in older posts. Perhaps we could change some of the codes to not display an image at all (e.g. ;), :D) - I'd like to hear more opinions on this. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Community Information Center
Community Suggestions and Feedback
smiles
Top