Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="dtownley1" data-source="post: 392357" data-attributes="member: 20564">I'm not a big fan of that technique. Occassionally, it's done well, but it can easily look cliched and corny. I don't think it really adds anything here. As for the technique - with your selection, I would have switched to quick mask to allow blurring of the mask around the hand. There is movement and blurring there, yet the selection is pixel sharp. I actually think it's too sharp. Might have been better to feather the selection ever so slightly.Having said that, I think it's a great shot. ISO at 1600 though, wow. From what I've seen and heard, Canons perform very well even at higher ISO settings like that. I think other brands at that ISO would display a lot more grain.</blockquote>