Forums
New posts
Articles
Product Reviews
Policies
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
Switcher Hangout (Windows to Mac)
Safari doesn't use the entire screen's width as IE - Any ideas?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="D3v1L80Y" data-source="post: 632039" data-attributes="member: 2960"><p>If screen real estate were measured in inches, then that would make sense.</p><p></p><p>However, screen real estate is measured in pixels, not inches... hence, you argument is the one that doesn't add up. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p>That 13" model computer (1280 x 800) today has more screen real estate than its 15" (1152 x 768) predecessors.</p><p></p><p>At home, I have two 17" Apple Studio Displays. I also have a 24" Sun Widescreen monitor. The 17 inchers are taller from top to bottom in physical height compared to the 24". However, the 24" has much more screen real estate, even if the physical height is shorter.</p><p></p><p>Now, there are some studio displays that have a higher resolution capability than a widescreen display. If that were the case, then yes, those would have more real estate than a widescreen.</p><p></p><p>It's all about the pixels... not the inches. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="D3v1L80Y, post: 632039, member: 2960"] If screen real estate were measured in inches, then that would make sense. However, screen real estate is measured in pixels, not inches... hence, you argument is the one that doesn't add up. :D That 13" model computer (1280 x 800) today has more screen real estate than its 15" (1152 x 768) predecessors. At home, I have two 17" Apple Studio Displays. I also have a 24" Sun Widescreen monitor. The 17 inchers are taller from top to bottom in physical height compared to the 24". However, the 24" has much more screen real estate, even if the physical height is shorter. Now, there are some studio displays that have a higher resolution capability than a widescreen display. If that were the case, then yes, those would have more real estate than a widescreen. It's all about the pixels... not the inches. :D [/QUOTE]
Verification
Name this item. 🍎
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
Switcher Hangout (Windows to Mac)
Safari doesn't use the entire screen's width as IE - Any ideas?
Top