- Joined
- May 17, 2007
- Messages
- 23
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 1
- Location
- East Molesey, Surrey, UK.
- Your Mac's Specs
- Intel iMac, MacBook Pro, MacBook Air, iPad, iPhone 4, iPods, AirPort blah blah
Ok, new here so I'll just blast the question out and see what comes back:
Situation:
I've been into Macs for quite a while now but our business ,of which I am the manager, is now looking to replace its aging computers with something White and slick (and I don't mean George Michael's latest release).
Since we mainly use Excel and Word for our documentation we're pretty well catered for to shift over to Mac. However, the sticking point is MS Access upon which our whole business revolves. Since we don't want to transfer our existing records to a similar Mac application, as we have built and extensively adapted our database to meet our exact requirements, we have to run Access on a Mac. Now the thought of having to boot our machines every few minutes into either one or another operating systems is a bit of a curdler as in business we simply don't have the time. Conclusively 'Parallels' seems like the ideal way to go as we can have everything Mac except one window which runs XP.
Could anyone who has specific experience of running Parallels give me some feedback as to how well it works, and moreso if any problems have been experienced along the way and how they were cured. If anyone has experience with Access on Parallels then any info would be highly appreciated.
Access is a particularly picky piece of software, although undoubtedly good, and the slightest thing can upset it so before I put my MDs business (and my £50k salary) on the line I'd like to be sure that a Mac will run Access ok.
The machines which are not yet purchased are likely to be five 20" 2.16Ghz Intel iMacs running on a peer to peer network with one host and four clients.
Sorry for a mad long post but since it's a business thing I have to be sure that everything's covered.
Cheers!
BTW, I'm not into Microsoft bashing as I believe they make a good product that the business world understands and uses with reasonable fluidity. Macs on the other hand are targeted more at creativity, reliability and flexibility. Different machines for different uses, although there's no reason why Mac can't be prolific in both arenas.
Situation:
I've been into Macs for quite a while now but our business ,of which I am the manager, is now looking to replace its aging computers with something White and slick (and I don't mean George Michael's latest release).
Since we mainly use Excel and Word for our documentation we're pretty well catered for to shift over to Mac. However, the sticking point is MS Access upon which our whole business revolves. Since we don't want to transfer our existing records to a similar Mac application, as we have built and extensively adapted our database to meet our exact requirements, we have to run Access on a Mac. Now the thought of having to boot our machines every few minutes into either one or another operating systems is a bit of a curdler as in business we simply don't have the time. Conclusively 'Parallels' seems like the ideal way to go as we can have everything Mac except one window which runs XP.
Could anyone who has specific experience of running Parallels give me some feedback as to how well it works, and moreso if any problems have been experienced along the way and how they were cured. If anyone has experience with Access on Parallels then any info would be highly appreciated.
Access is a particularly picky piece of software, although undoubtedly good, and the slightest thing can upset it so before I put my MDs business (and my £50k salary) on the line I'd like to be sure that a Mac will run Access ok.
The machines which are not yet purchased are likely to be five 20" 2.16Ghz Intel iMacs running on a peer to peer network with one host and four clients.
Sorry for a mad long post but since it's a business thing I have to be sure that everything's covered.
Cheers!
BTW, I'm not into Microsoft bashing as I believe they make a good product that the business world understands and uses with reasonable fluidity. Macs on the other hand are targeted more at creativity, reliability and flexibility. Different machines for different uses, although there's no reason why Mac can't be prolific in both arenas.