Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="hugtheslug" data-source="post: 1603721" data-attributes="member: 48841">Just got hold of a Sigma 18-250 HSM OS Macro etc. lens for my Nikon D5000 after reading all the reviews, and sold the kit 18-55 and 55-200 to make the £££ back.Also a 35mm Nikon F1.8 prime for low light stuff.I think the reviews were pretty accurate as the Sigma seems even better than either of the other two.First, a shot of the moon, bearing in mind shot hand held at 250mm, ISO 400, 1/80, f6.3 ...... followed by a closeup of a butterfly on our Buddleia bush, ISO 400, 1/1000 at f6.3Comments always welcome.Cheers <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Hugh[ATTACH=full]20915[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]20916[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="hugtheslug, post: 1603721, member: 48841"] Just got hold of a Sigma 18-250 HSM OS Macro etc. lens for my Nikon D5000 after reading all the reviews, and sold the kit 18-55 and 55-200 to make the £££ back. Also a 35mm Nikon F1.8 prime for low light stuff. I think the reviews were pretty accurate as the Sigma seems even better than either of the other two. First, a shot of the moon, bearing in mind shot hand held at 250mm, ISO 400, 1/80, f6.3 ... ... followed by a closeup of a butterfly on our Buddleia bush, ISO 400, 1/1000 at f6.3 Comments always welcome. Cheers :) Hugh [ATTACH=full]20915[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]20916[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification

Name this item. 🍎