Forums
New posts
Articles
Product Reviews
Policies
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Digital Lifestyle
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
Looking to buy a new Camera...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Craig" data-source="post: 391641" data-attributes="member: 20400"><p>Well in the end they ranked the cameras,</p><p></p><p>1st: Fuji</p><p>2nd: Sony</p><p>3rd: Canon</p><p></p><p>Basically they concluded the Fuji was the best performer in all the categories they tested in (autofocus, exposure etc), especially in low light and the performance of the intelligent flash. There is a non-video review on the site aswell (see link below). It is not laid out excellently and has ads in it (which I hate) but it is readable.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://gadgetshow.five.tv/jsp/5gsmain.jsp?lnk=401&featureid=265&pageid=535&show=s5e11&section=Consumer" target="_blank">http://gadgetshow.five.tv/jsp/5gsmain.jsp?lnk=401&featureid=265&pageid=535&show=s5e11&section=Consumer</a></p><p></p><p>Edit: Also, the opinions at the end of the review: </p><p></p><p>Canon, poor image processing in low light, jpeg artifacts, under exposed and noisy.</p><p></p><p>Sony, better. But poor exposure balance, some underexposure and highlights blown in flash pictures. A little soft in areas, but better.</p><p></p><p>Fuji, good in all aspects. Some shots '...wouldn't double take at in someones's portfolio.'</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Craig, post: 391641, member: 20400"] Well in the end they ranked the cameras, 1st: Fuji 2nd: Sony 3rd: Canon Basically they concluded the Fuji was the best performer in all the categories they tested in (autofocus, exposure etc), especially in low light and the performance of the intelligent flash. There is a non-video review on the site aswell (see link below). It is not laid out excellently and has ads in it (which I hate) but it is readable. [url]http://gadgetshow.five.tv/jsp/5gsmain.jsp?lnk=401&featureid=265&pageid=535&show=s5e11§ion=Consumer[/url] Edit: Also, the opinions at the end of the review: Canon, poor image processing in low light, jpeg artifacts, under exposed and noisy. Sony, better. But poor exposure balance, some underexposure and highlights blown in flash pictures. A little soft in areas, but better. Fuji, good in all aspects. Some shots '...wouldn't double take at in someones's portfolio.' [/QUOTE]
Verification
Name this item. 🍎
Post reply
Forums
Digital Lifestyle
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
Looking to buy a new Camera...
Top
