Forums
New posts
Articles
Product Reviews
Policies
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Digital Lifestyle
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
Is fast glass with image stabalizing redundant?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Village Idiot" data-source="post: 1143181" data-attributes="member: 29446"><p>If you're going to definitely go full frame, look at the 17-40 f/4L. It's nothing really special on a crop sensor, but it's a great lens for the price on a ff camera. It's a lot cheaper than the 16-35 and the filter size is 17mm, which is the same as the 70-200s and the 24-70. The 16-35 has a larger filter. This can save you some money in the long run by only having to buy one size of filters. </p><p></p><p>I also shoot in low life conditions with the f/4 and have to problems with it with the 5d mkii.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Village Idiot, post: 1143181, member: 29446"] If you're going to definitely go full frame, look at the 17-40 f/4L. It's nothing really special on a crop sensor, but it's a great lens for the price on a ff camera. It's a lot cheaper than the 16-35 and the filter size is 17mm, which is the same as the 70-200s and the 24-70. The 16-35 has a larger filter. This can save you some money in the long run by only having to buy one size of filters. I also shoot in low life conditions with the f/4 and have to problems with it with the 5d mkii. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Name this item. 🍎
Post reply
Forums
Digital Lifestyle
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
Is fast glass with image stabalizing redundant?
Top
