Forums
New posts
Articles
Product Reviews
Policies
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Digital Lifestyle
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
Image Viewer better then ACDSee Classic 2.43?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="x0054" data-source="post: 1534163" data-attributes="member: 305476"><p>I tried Picasa as well, it's not bad, I like using it for organizing photos, etc. But it's not quite what I am looking for, in terms of just an image viewer, and it's still not quite fast enough. I also used Xee3, it's not bad, but again, if I want to look through photos as quickly as possible, in a period of 10 seconds I can get through fully loading 23 pictures with ACDSee Classic, while Xee3 loads only 14 in the same time, and the CPU load during the entire 10 seconds is at 100% for Xee3 while only about 30% for ACDSee.</p><p></p><p>I realize that it's a little silly to want to look at that many photos so fast. I personally need it for scientific research, so I would be going through maybe 500 images before I find one I need, and I do not need more then a glance to know if the image works for me or not.</p><p></p><p>I'll give ViewIt a try, will post results.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="x0054, post: 1534163, member: 305476"] I tried Picasa as well, it's not bad, I like using it for organizing photos, etc. But it's not quite what I am looking for, in terms of just an image viewer, and it's still not quite fast enough. I also used Xee3, it's not bad, but again, if I want to look through photos as quickly as possible, in a period of 10 seconds I can get through fully loading 23 pictures with ACDSee Classic, while Xee3 loads only 14 in the same time, and the CPU load during the entire 10 seconds is at 100% for Xee3 while only about 30% for ACDSee. I realize that it's a little silly to want to look at that many photos so fast. I personally need it for scientific research, so I would be going through maybe 500 images before I find one I need, and I do not need more then a glance to know if the image works for me or not. I'll give ViewIt a try, will post results. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Name this item 🌈
Post reply
Forums
Digital Lifestyle
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
Image Viewer better then ACDSee Classic 2.43?
Top
