Forums
New posts
Articles
Product Reviews
Policies
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Digital Lifestyle
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
Canon XTi Users, need an opinion pls.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="laimonas.s" data-source="post: 391853" data-attributes="member: 29189"><p>Image stabiliser wount help much in low light, well at least it wount stop movement any better than non-IS lens/camera. It only reduces camera shake, not making the sensor capture the light faster (thats the ISO job...). </p><p></p><p>The main use of this feature is hand-holding long focal length lenses, as the longer, the higher shutter speed you need to avoid camera shake. I believe for 200mm lens you will need around 1/250th.</p><p></p><p>As you said there is no point of going for a sony just for this feature. Firstly because you can easily shoot without it, and secondly, you can buy image stabilised lenses for canon. Fine, they might be more expensive, but canons have a lot bigger range of lenses than sony!</p><p></p><p>Vamks: you probably knew this already, i just wanted to make sure other people didnt misunderstand what exactly image stabilizers do, as it is a usual misconception!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="laimonas.s, post: 391853, member: 29189"] Image stabiliser wount help much in low light, well at least it wount stop movement any better than non-IS lens/camera. It only reduces camera shake, not making the sensor capture the light faster (thats the ISO job...). The main use of this feature is hand-holding long focal length lenses, as the longer, the higher shutter speed you need to avoid camera shake. I believe for 200mm lens you will need around 1/250th. As you said there is no point of going for a sony just for this feature. Firstly because you can easily shoot without it, and secondly, you can buy image stabilised lenses for canon. Fine, they might be more expensive, but canons have a lot bigger range of lenses than sony! Vamks: you probably knew this already, i just wanted to make sure other people didnt misunderstand what exactly image stabilizers do, as it is a usual misconception! [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Digital Lifestyle
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
Canon XTi Users, need an opinion pls.
Top