- Joined
- May 12, 2005
- Messages
- 555
- Reaction score
- 8
- Points
- 18
- Location
- Ridgecrest, CA
- Your Mac's Specs
- rMBP (Mid-2015), 2.8 Ghz i7, 16GB DDR3, AMD M370X Gfx, 1 TB SSD
A few days ago after many months of saving money and anticipation, I ordered a new dual 2.3 Ghz Powermac from the Apple Store with a 23" apple display. I'm VERY excited and can't wait till it comes!!!
However, as one of my options, I chose the ATI Radeon 9650 graphix card figuring that 256MB is better than 128 for gaming etc. Since then I have seen comparisons that show the 9650 to be less than stellar, and it has caused me great concern about how my new machine will perform (yeah I know, counting my chickens before they hatch...)
I get the impression that Apple offers this card as a cheaper way to give 30" display support to their computers. 30" display support isn't a factor for me, as I have no desire (or money) for a 30". Did I waste my money on an "upgrade" that I don't need, or will this card outperform the Radeon 9600?
FYI: I plan on playing Doom 3, Halo, UT2004, X-plane and doing some light photo/video stuff with Photoshop and Lightwave as my most graphic-intensive apps.
However, as one of my options, I chose the ATI Radeon 9650 graphix card figuring that 256MB is better than 128 for gaming etc. Since then I have seen comparisons that show the 9650 to be less than stellar, and it has caused me great concern about how my new machine will perform (yeah I know, counting my chickens before they hatch...)
I get the impression that Apple offers this card as a cheaper way to give 30" display support to their computers. 30" display support isn't a factor for me, as I have no desire (or money) for a 30". Did I waste my money on an "upgrade" that I don't need, or will this card outperform the Radeon 9600?
FYI: I plan on playing Doom 3, Halo, UT2004, X-plane and doing some light photo/video stuff with Photoshop and Lightwave as my most graphic-intensive apps.