Forums
New posts
Articles
Product Reviews
Policies
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Apple Computing Products:
macOS - Notebook Hardware
10 GB mixed RAM, 8 GB Crucial RAM, or 8 GB Corsair RAM - Early 2011 13" MBP
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="darnocs" data-source="post: 1625932" data-attributes="member: 339219"><p>I've read a lot of posts about people warning against using mixed vendors and mixed RAM sizes, but none of those people have said they tried it themselves. On the other hand, I have seen a number of posts from people who have tried using mixed RAM vendors and sizes and they say it works fine.</p><p></p><p>Can anyone tell me objectively which of these two options would be best for upgrading my Early 2011 MacBook Pro 13":</p><p></p><p>(A) <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005LDLVAO/?tag=macforums0e4-20" target="_blank">10 GB RAM</a> - this single 8 GB module + one of the stock 2 GB modules</p><p></p><p>(B) <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B002YUF8ZG/?tag=macforums0e4-20" target="_blank">8 GB Corsair RAM</a> - this is clocked at 1333 MHz and 1.5 volts</p><p></p><p>(C) <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005LDLVAO/?tag=macforums0e4-20" target="_blank">8 GB Crucial RAM</a> - this is clocked at 1600 MHz and 1.35/1.5 volts (not sure what the / indicates)</p><p></p><p>Regarding options B and C, which would be better: Corsair RAM that is clocked to what the Mac is default set to (1333 MHz) but has higher voltage, or Crucial RAM that is overclocked (and from what I've read, it'll auto-downclock to 1333) but has possibly lower voltage. There's only a $2 difference between the two.</p><p></p><p>Thanks!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="darnocs, post: 1625932, member: 339219"] I've read a lot of posts about people warning against using mixed vendors and mixed RAM sizes, but none of those people have said they tried it themselves. On the other hand, I have seen a number of posts from people who have tried using mixed RAM vendors and sizes and they say it works fine. Can anyone tell me objectively which of these two options would be best for upgrading my Early 2011 MacBook Pro 13": (A) [URL="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005LDLVAO/?tag=macforums0e4-20"]10 GB RAM[/URL] - this single 8 GB module + one of the stock 2 GB modules (B) [URL="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B002YUF8ZG/?tag=macforums0e4-20"]8 GB Corsair RAM[/URL] - this is clocked at 1333 MHz and 1.5 volts (C) [URL="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005LDLVAO/?tag=macforums0e4-20"]8 GB Crucial RAM[/URL] - this is clocked at 1600 MHz and 1.35/1.5 volts (not sure what the / indicates) Regarding options B and C, which would be better: Corsair RAM that is clocked to what the Mac is default set to (1333 MHz) but has higher voltage, or Crucial RAM that is overclocked (and from what I've read, it'll auto-downclock to 1333) but has possibly lower voltage. There's only a $2 difference between the two. Thanks! [/QUOTE]
Verification
Name this item. 🍎
Post reply
Forums
Apple Computing Products:
macOS - Notebook Hardware
10 GB mixed RAM, 8 GB Crucial RAM, or 8 GB Corsair RAM - Early 2011 13" MBP
Top