• Welcome to the new Mac-Forums. See News and Community Announcements for more details.

1 TB storage on new Macbook Pro

bpe


Joined
Apr 30, 2010
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Is there really a market for this? $500 add seems excessive with much cheaper external drive options.
 

bobtomay

,
Retired Staff
Joined
Dec 22, 2006
Messages
26,572
Reaction score
674
Points
113
Location
Texas, where else?
Your Mac's Specs
15" MBP '06 2.33 C2D 4GB 10.7; 13" MBA '14 1.8 i7 8GB 10.11; 21" iMac '13 2.9 i5 8GB 10.11; 6S
If you're only talking about the diff in price between the 512 GB and 1 TB flash storage - if you want it, that's what it's going to cost you.

Except for the Samdung EVO, don't think you're going to find a 1TB SSD for less than $900-$1,000 just yet. Double the price of the 500GB SSD. Although, I'd guess the rest of them should drop in the next 6 months down to where Samdung has theirs priced.

There is always a market for the highest end gear.

edit:
deleted
 
Joined
Oct 31, 2013
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Points
3
Location
Fresno, CA
Your Mac's Specs
Late 2013 MacBook Air (13") w/ max specs
I vaguely remember spending $754 or so for a 256GB SSD (Corsair 256 GB Performance Series Internal Solid State Drive CMFSSD-256GBG2D) upgrade for my MacBook in early 2010. Now the MacBook Air comes with a 512GB SSD option... and it costs, what, $400 extra?

Moral of the story: If the price is too high, wait a year.
 
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
25,294
Reaction score
402
Points
83
Location
Nambucca Heads Australia
Your Mac's Specs
iMac, i7 4GHz, 32GB memory, 1TB blade drive, OS X.15.5.
Or four or five.

We have been saying now for ages 'the price will drop' but the drop is very, very slow.
 

pigoo3

Well-known member
Staff member
Admin
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
41,950
Reaction score
660
Points
113
Location
U.S.
Your Mac's Specs
2011 17" MBP 2.2ghz, 16gig ram, OS 10.11.6
Is there really a market for this? $500 add seems excessive with much cheaper external drive options.
A 1TB SSD (at the current time) is far from the "sweet spot" in terms of cost/gig for SSD's. You're going to pay more $$$/gig...for an SSD that large.

FYI...Apple's prices for upgrades generally do not match what the open market is charging (Apple's prices are usually higher...and many times...MUCH higher).

- Nick
 

bobtomay

,
Retired Staff
Joined
Dec 22, 2006
Messages
26,572
Reaction score
674
Points
113
Location
Texas, where else?
Your Mac's Specs
15" MBP '06 2.33 C2D 4GB 10.7; 13" MBA '14 1.8 i7 8GB 10.11; 21" iMac '13 2.9 i5 8GB 10.11; 6S
Little more looking around, Crucial has their 960 GB at $600 now and Amazon selling it at $540. That's already not much more than the 500 GB SSDs were just a year ago.
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2013
Messages
90
Reaction score
3
Points
8
Little more looking around, Crucial has their 960 GB at $600 now and Amazon selling it at $540. That's already not much more than the 500 GB SSDs were just a year ago.

This drive (Crucial M4 series) is absolutely AMAZING. I had a couple Macbook Pros that I picked up used from wegener media a few months ago, and ended up with the drives in them.. Wegener had pre-purchased a large order of that drive prior to release and was selling them at around $50 under the list price at the time for folks doing preorders. At the time (august/Sept?) it was a bit pricey in my opinion, even though the $600 tag then, was $400 cheaper than the competing OWC 1tb drive -- $1050)..

But they convinced me to give one a try.. WOW - glad I went for it!

Insanely fast boot times (<15 seconds on 3 different systems!)...

Now, I had already owned one of the OWC 1tb drives, but had a chance to offload it prior to the release (the folks at wegener knew it was coming and kept me in the loop), so I was able to sell it for more than enough to buy the new crucial AND to max out my i7 in 16gb of RAM. kinda nice to have known ahead of time!

BUT....There is no comparison in terms of performance. Even the OWC SSD is quite slow compared to the Crucial. (no OWC's numbers are really not that accurate, IMHO - I've swapped drives in systems and done side-by-side comparison tests on photoshop and Lightroom)..


Now all that said, the SSHD (hybrid SSD) that Seagate puts out is a good contender, if you're one of those folks who craves speed but doesn't have an extra $500 to 'invest'....

I put one in the wife's Macbook Pro, along with a load of RAM.. It is actually only 15-20% slower than my full blown SSD drive! And at $110 delivered (amazon), there's no compelling reason (in my mind) for "consumer-grade" folks to dump the extra $400 into the SSD (if of course, you need the space a 1tb has to offer)...

I've ended up recommending (and installing) dozens of the Seagate hybrid drives this fall for clients, and am quite content with the results. It provides a very substantial performance boost but with only a minimal price bump..

My recommendation:

1. IF performance is your key AND your machine will do well with it*:
Get the Crucial M4 series..BUT.. get it IF **AND ONLY IF** your Macbook Pro is a 2012 or later..


*IF your Mac is 2009-2011, get the Crucial M500.

Here's why: the 09-11 macbook Pros will downclock a 6gb drive to........1.5gb speed... :Angry:
yup...
But they'll run the 3gb drive just perfectly at 3gb speed (the M500 series is 3gb, the M4 is 6gb)

2. if $$ is the critical factor, get the Seagate Hybrid (SSHD)..


Either way, I'd choose either one of these hands down over the fastest conventional (7200rpm, etc) HDD..

AND, final note: make sure you keep a current Time Machine! SSD drives are significantly reliable.. but..... murphys law still exists!!
 
Top