Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Jury finds Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's patents, awards Apple more than <img  bi
    OneMoreThing...'s Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 30, 2005
    Posts
    6,892
    Rep Power
    21
    Post Jury finds Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's patents, awards Apple more than $1 bi

  2. #2
    Jury finds Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's patents, awards Apple more than <img  bi
    iggibar's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 20, 2009
    Location
    BeatMichigan
    Posts
    4,314
    Your Mac's Specs
    A few computers, iPhone 11 Pro Max, Apple Watch 1&5, iPad Pro 11"
    Rep Power
    16
    Warning: Do NOT go reading through Android threads/forums. That's a warning! You thought people hated Apple before, you've don't know what's coming. They will always skew results to favor their argument, even though this is a court decision.

    I wonder how much total $$$$$$$$$ this process has cost Apple so far?
    3.0GHz 10x Mac Pro 6.13.46GHz 12x Mac Pro 5.12.66GHz 4x Mac Pro 4.12.2GHz i7 15" MBP 15.12.3GHz i7 15" MBP 11.32.8GHz i7 13" MBP 11.12.66Ghz i7 15"MBP 6.22.4GHz 15" MBP 5.12.4GHz 13" MBP 7.1

  3. #3
    Jury finds Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's patents, awards Apple more than <img  bi
    chscag's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 23, 2008
    Location
    Keller, Texas
    Posts
    60,511
    Your Mac's Specs
    2017 27" iMac, 10.5" iPad Pro, iPhone 7+, iPhone 8, Numerous iPods, Catalina
    Rep Power
    56
    Not surprising, recently a South Korean court found Samsung not guilty of copying Apple patents to the iPhone. Of course their finding doesn't amount to a hill of beans.

    I wonder how much total $$$$$$$$$ this process has cost Apple so far?
    Don't even think about it, lawyers are making more than brain surgeons nowadays.

  4. #4
    Jury finds Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's patents, awards Apple more than <img  bi

    Member Since
    May 20, 2009
    Posts
    44
    Rep Power
    12
    Whoooohooo!

    I know, there are the other side including if Apple gets all they want there would be no cheap(er) imitations.

    But as an engineer, it's the principle, YOU DO NOT STEAL MY COOL STUFF. Everybody knows if it wasn't for Apple, there would be no touch screen (or a lousy facsimile), no gesture, no cool tooo-eing spring effect as one scrolls. Without Apple, how many times the other guys tried to make a tablet?

    Google, hope u got the message.

  5. #5
    Jury finds Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's patents, awards Apple more than <img  bi
    XJ-linux's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 02, 2007
    Location
    Going Galt...
    Posts
    3,494
    Your Mac's Specs
    MacBookAir5,2:10.13.6-iMac18,3:10.13.6-iPhone9,3:11.4.1
    Rep Power
    19
    This stuff is getting old. CEO's with pistols at dawn and be done with it.
    Never judge a man, untill you have walked a mile in his shoes...
    That way you'll be a mile away from him, and you'll have his shoes.

  6. #6
    Jury finds Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's patents, awards Apple more than <img  bi
    vansmith's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 19, 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    19,853
    Your Mac's Specs
    Early 2015 13" rMBP
    Rep Power
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by iggibar View Post
    They will always skew results to favor their argument, even though this is a court decision.
    And we don't? The problem of bias is never endemic only to selective communities. This is especially salient with court decisions since there is always the appeals process.

    Quote Originally Posted by MrBobb View Post
    Everybody knows if it wasn't for Apple, there would be no touch screen (or a lousy facsimile), no gesture, no cool tooo-eing spring effect as one scrolls.
    No we don't. Touch screens? They've been around for ages. In fact, HP built a touchscreen computer back in 1983 (here). Gestures? They were developed back in the 80s at the University of Toronto. Inertia scrolling? Sun did it 1992. Apple invented nothing in that list you provided. This is why it's important to separate invention from commercial success.

    As for the topic itself, like every patent debate everywhere in the industry, this will be appealed, go nowhere, magically disappear from the news and will end with an undisclosed settlement in which the landscape of innovation won't change in the slightest. A victory for Apple? Sure. Will this change anything? Not a bit. Even if Samsung has to pay out the billion, they can absorb it without even blinking. Being the largest mobile phone maker in the world has its perks sometimes (here, here).
    Important Links: Community Guidelines : Use the reputation system if you've been helped.
    M-F Blog :: Write for the blog
    Writing a Quality Post

  7. #7
    Jury finds Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's patents, awards Apple more than <img  bi
    Lifeisabeach's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 30, 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Neptune
    Posts
    8,398
    Your Mac's Specs
    27" 2019 iMac
    Rep Power
    24
    I'm really not surprised. Initially, I was actually kinda hoping Apple would lose at least in part... I really feel they need a little humility. But as I followed the trial, and the mountains of evidence piled on (I mean really... the engineer conclusions as they compared features was to "make it more like Apple"), you'd have to be dense to think they weren't copying Apple deliberately. One can argue whether or not any company should be able to patent the things they do, but that's irrelevant. Fact is they can and Apple is obligated to defend them.

    Please verify and include the exact model/year of your Mac and OS X version number (available from "About This Mac", then "More Info" on the Apple menu).
    ------
    Links: Onyx | Find Any File | Apple Hardware Test | How to test your hard drive | DetectX: Malware monitoring and removal | Uninstall MacKeeper
    ------
    Lifeisabeach - Mac-Forums Member of the Month June 2009, Feb 2012, and March 2013.

  8. #8
    Jury finds Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's patents, awards Apple more than <img  bi
    osxx's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 19, 2008
    Location
    houston texas
    Posts
    4,695
    Your Mac's Specs
    09 MBP 8GB ram 500GB HD OS 10.9 32B iPad 4 32GB iPhone 5 iOs7 2TB TC Apple TV3
    Rep Power
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by lifeisabeach View Post
    I'm really not surprised. Initially, I was actually kinda hoping Apple would lose at least in part... I really feel they need a little humility. But as I followed the trial, and the mountains of evidence piled on (I mean really... the engineer conclusions as they compared features was to "make it more like Apple"), you'd have to be dense to think they weren't copying Apple deliberately. One can argue whether or not any company should be able to patent the things they do, but that's irrelevant. Fact is they can and Apple is obligated to defend them.
    I agree and well said.

  9. #9
    Jury finds Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's patents, awards Apple more than <img  bi

    Member Since
    May 20, 2009
    Posts
    44
    Rep Power
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by vansmith View Post
    No we don't. Touch screens? They've been around for ages. In fact, HP built a touchscreen computer back in 1983 (here). Gestures? They were developed back in the 80s at the University of Toronto. Inertia scrolling? Sun did it 1992. Apple invented nothing in that list you provided. This is why it's important to separate invention from commercial success.
    Of course some of these things been around, but not good enough for the general public to want to keep using them. So exactly, commercial success = Apple perfected the technology, and they should be rewarded for the effort. Everybody knows, if takes 20% effort to make something work, but another 80% to make it work cool.

    I dunno why Google with all its resources, has to imitate Apple.

  10. #10
    Jury finds Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's patents, awards Apple more than <img  bi
    vansmith's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 19, 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    19,853
    Your Mac's Specs
    Early 2015 13" rMBP
    Rep Power
    31
    So because Apple "perfected" it, they have the right to litigate? I'm not saying Apple doesn't have valid patents here (obviously they do) but you can't say that perfecting a technology gives someone the right to sue because who's to say that Apple has perfected anything? Again, you can't conflate things - commercial success does not equal perfection. Instead, commercial success equals "the best thing around that is easy and reasonable priced." Nothing is ever perfected in engineering and if people believed that products had been perfected, we'd still be using 100 year old technology (since no one would have improved upon then perfect technology).

    Google imitating Apple? Sure but it works both ways. iOS's notification system? Yeah, Android had that down well before Apple implemented an almost identical system. Cloud syncing with iCloud? Google baked in syncing well before iCloud was released. Over the air updates? Google did it first. iMessage? That looks a lot like RIM's BBM (not necessarily in quality but in the idea). Tabbed browsing for mobile browsers? Apple was late to the game on that one. The borrowing seeps into OS X as well. The new "smart search" in Safari? Google put that in Chrome ages ago. The new "tab view" in Safari? Chrome had "tab overview" implemented quite a while ago.

    I'm not trying to make the argument that Google invented everything. In fact, they don't and they have quite obviously adapted things used elsewhere. The point though still stands - Apple doesn't do everything from scratch like every other company. Should Apple be rewarded for all the original and hard work that they do? Absolutely. Should they have the right to defend it? You bet. Are they somehow better than everyone else at everything (which your posts seem to imply)? No because, in many respects, they're like every other tech company.
    Important Links: Community Guidelines : Use the reputation system if you've been helped.
    M-F Blog :: Write for the blog
    Writing a Quality Post

  11. #11
    Jury finds Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's patents, awards Apple more than <img  bi
    ermadd's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 24, 2012
    Location
    Washington State Wastelands
    Posts
    19
    Rep Power
    8
    Two companies making similar products in intense competition? Sounds perfect for a consumer. Maintaining motivation to make something new if anyone can copy it? Who will want to design? Double edged I don't really know whats best. Lawsuits suck I know that. I really love apple products but was amazed by how much iOS 5 copied from the jailbreaking community. Friends showed 5 blatant copys and I couldn't prove those developers started working for Apple.

    The business worlds tough =)
    Macbook Pro Retina | Mid-2012 OS X 10.8.1 | 2.6 GHz Intel Core i7 | 8GB DDR3 512 SSD HD
    Sony Vaio | Win8 Release Preview | 2.0 GHz Intel Core i7 | 8GB DDR3 750GB HD

  12. #12
    Jury finds Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's patents, awards Apple more than <img  bi
    baggss's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 10, 2004
    Location
    Margaritaville
    Posts
    10,346
    Your Mac's Specs
    3.4 Ghz i7 MacBook Pro (2015), iPad Pro (2014), iPhone Xs Max. Apple TV 4K
    Rep Power
    28
    Quote Originally Posted by vansmith View Post
    So because Apple "perfected" it, they have the right to litigate? I'm not saying Apple doesn't have valid patents here (obviously they do) but you can't say that perfecting a technology gives someone the right to sue because who's to say that Apple has perfected anything?
    At this point it has nothing to do with perfection and everything to do with Patents. Doesn't matter if Apple "perfected" it or not, they were able to patent it and able to prove to a jury that the competition did in fat violate the patent.

    The real issue here, IMO, is simply the ability to patent many of things that they did. If you write it vague enough, you can cover all of the bases and nobody else can use it without paying or the threat of a lawsuit. The whole process is out of whack, the lawsuits and proceedings are just a byproduct of a system that is out of control.

    Frankly, this makes me wonder if Apple might not be emboldened enough to try and go back and sue M$ again. I'd bet they could get a judge to toss out the old ruling and re-examining the case from the 80s/90s. It would be interesting to watch but would largely depend on what was patented when and by whom.

  13. #13
    Jury finds Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's patents, awards Apple more than <img  bi
    CrimsonRequiem's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 24, 2008
    Posts
    6,004
    Your Mac's Specs
    MBP 2.3 Ghz 4GB RAM 860 GB SSD, iMac 3.4 GHz Intel Core i7 32GB RAM, Fusion Drive 1TB
    Rep Power
    16
    Apple is good at marketing technology and features. Even if they didn't create it. Just saying.
    死神はリンゴしか食べない。

  14. #14
    Jury finds Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's patents, awards Apple more than <img  bi

    Member Since
    Sep 16, 2007
    Posts
    221
    Rep Power
    13
    Glasshouse.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Apple found guilty of Ebook price fixing . . . Damages to follow !!
    By TattooedMac in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-11-2013, 06:46 AM
  2. Ex-Apple manager charged in kickback scheme pleads guilty, forfeits $2.3M
    By the8thark in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-01-2011, 12:41 AM
  3. Some more Apple Patents
    By the8thark in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-03-2010, 02:35 AM
  4. Apple finds unlikelly HTML 5 ally
    By louishen in forum Schweb's Lounge
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-03-2010, 09:24 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •