Please visit the new Mac-Forums Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/macforums1




Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Post Apple loses bid to keep information sealed in Psystar case
    Apple loses bid to keep information sealed in Psystar case

    In its ongoing suit against unauthorized Mac clone maker Psystar, Apple has been denied in its bid to keep certain information about OS X sealed from public view. According to Bloomberg, Judge William Alsup noted that information Apple claims are "trade secrets" are already publicly available on the internet from a variety of sources.

    Apple attempted to claim that although this information about OS X was already publicly available, since the company itself hadn't confirmed its veracity the information still qualified for trade secret protection. Judge Alsup disagreed, saying, "Apple cannot have this court seal information merely to avoid confirmation that the publicly available sources got it right."

    Apple is suing Psystar for copyright infringement over Psystar producing and selling unauthorized clones of the Mac running Apple's proprietary Mac OS X software. Apple successfully obtained a sales injunction against Psystar years ago, and that injunction was recently upheld in court -- a somewhat moot point, as the company hasn't produced any hardware since 2009.

    Apple loses bid to keep information sealed in Psystar case originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.




    Source*|*Permalink*|*Email this*|*Comments
    Read more

  2. #2
    Hmm. I wonder what information about OSX they're trying to protect...

  3. #3
    Apple loses bid to keep information sealed in Psystar case
    XJ-linux's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 02, 2007
    Location
    Going Galt...
    Posts
    3,494
    Your Mac's Specs
    MacBookAir5,2:10.13.6-iMac18,3:10.13.6-iPhone9,3:11.4.1
    Rep Power
    18
    Apple attempted to claim that although this information about OS X was already publicly available, since the company itself hadn't confirmed its veracity the information still qualified for trade secret protection.

    Classic!

    Can I sue someone for slander or libel if they reference documentation that I did or said something, but I didn't confirm that I did or said it? This could be a interesting precedent. I may have to come up with an early retirement scheme!
    Never judge a man, untill you have walked a mile in his shoes...
    That way you'll be a mile away from him, and you'll have his shoes.

  4. #4
    Apple loses bid to keep information sealed in Psystar case
    harryb2448's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 28, 2007
    Location
    Nambucca Heads Australia
    Posts
    25,193
    Your Mac's Specs
    iMac, i7 4GHz, 32GB memory, 1TB Blade, OS X.14.6 Mojave,
    Rep Power
    31
    Off to appeals. Keeps lawyers off the streets I guess.
    Using OS X.7 or later make a bootable USB thumb drive before running Installer!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Clone Mac maker Psystar loses to Apple in attempted court appeal
    By OneMoreThing... in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-29-2011, 05:49 PM
  2. Apple wipes the floor with Psystar in court, EULA upheld.
    By cwa107 in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 12-16-2009, 09:33 PM
  3. Apple sues clone maker Psystar
    By dtravis7 in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-22-2008, 06:07 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-02-2004, 12:18 PM
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-28-2004, 07:19 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •