Are upgrades good value for money on macbook retina?

Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
1
I checked out Geekbench scores for 15" macbook retinas, and despite having different levels of specifications, their geekbench scores are surprisingly similar. Apart from being able to store more data on it, what is the point of these upgrades?! Am I missing something?!
 

bobtomay

,
Retired Staff
Joined
Dec 22, 2006
Messages
26,561
Reaction score
677
Points
113
Location
Texas, where else?
Your Mac's Specs
15" MBP '06 2.33 C2D 4GB 10.7; 13" MBA '14 1.8 i7 8GB 10.11; 21" iMac '13 2.9 i5 8GB 10.11; 6S
What upgrades?
 

bobtomay

,
Retired Staff
Joined
Dec 22, 2006
Messages
26,561
Reaction score
677
Points
113
Location
Texas, where else?
Your Mac's Specs
15" MBP '06 2.33 C2D 4GB 10.7; 13" MBA '14 1.8 i7 8GB 10.11; 21" iMac '13 2.9 i5 8GB 10.11; 6S
General rule of thumb - always buy as much processor as you can afford.

What are you going to be using it for?
 
OP
A
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
1
I was going for the 2.6ghz i7 instead of the 2.3. The 2.7 is £240 more than the 2.6, so isnt that much of a benefit given the outlay.

I am a mature student and often have 7-8 websites open simultaneously whilst I word process. I will keep the macbook for at least 5 years, which is why I was contemplating a well specced 15" retina. I currently use windows, which I detest
 

bobtomay

,
Retired Staff
Joined
Dec 22, 2006
Messages
26,561
Reaction score
677
Points
113
Location
Texas, where else?
Your Mac's Specs
15" MBP '06 2.33 C2D 4GB 10.7; 13" MBA '14 1.8 i7 8GB 10.11; 21" iMac '13 2.9 i5 8GB 10.11; 6S
Any of the lower end dual core i5 chips will handle what you are describing.

The 2.6 quad i7 should keep you going for 5 years with what we currently know about CPUs and already a hefty price jump from the 2.3. The 2.7 is for people that just have to have the best they can get when they buy a computer.

You're getting 8 GB RAM with the jump in CPU. No reason to pay Apple to bump that up any higher for your usage.

The SSD option would easily decrease boot times by 50% and significantly in application start up and data read times if you're keeping say large photo libraries, etc. If you've never had an SSD, the HD is fine.
 
OP
A
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Thank you for your advice, Bobtomay. I'll go for the 2.6ghz, 16gb ram, and the 512ssd.
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top