mynameis said:
I fail to see how OS X is less expensive that Windows XP.
If you bought OS X when it first came out in March 01, and then purchased every update when they came out, you would have spent over $400. However, if you purchased Windows XP when it first came out in October 01, then just downloaded the free service packs as they came out, you would have spend a grand total of $100 to have the most up-to-date version of Windows for 5 years.
From Mac OS X 10.0 to 10.3, every major upgrade (not update) was close to a plain new system. The improvements were huge, with lots of new features, drivers, etc. And if I remember well, upgrading from 10.0 to 10.1 was free, or at least cheaper than the later upgrades.
You can't seriously compare that to the Service Packs for WinXP, which fixed lots of bugs and security issues, certainly, but did not add any new features, except SP2, and even that one didn't add a lot of features.
Windows XP, even after SP2, did not improve a lot during all those years, featurewise.
Mac OS X 10.4 is such an improved version of OS X that it is very difficult to even compare it to 10.0.
The 10.3 to 10.4 upgrade is a different story though, the little differences aren't worth a full price, especially taken into account that they removed software from it (no Stuffit, no iMovie and iDVD, which came with the 10.3 retail version).
And, by the way, when Windows XP came out, it was not available at $100,-... $250,- for the full retail version would be a more realistic price, back then.