*In best defensive bully voice* YOU LOOK STUPID ! !!
Well, I dunno. When I was looking at some of the new "features", I did kind of get the impression that a lot of it was just redundant and unnecessary. Why in the world would I need to click on an icon in order to have all my apps pop up on my desktop, thus needing me to click on another one to activate it? As it stands, I do that with my dock folders and dock icons. I really don't understand how this is supposed to do anything other than add unnecessary GUI changes.
My overall feeling is that I hope the new OS is going to represent more than just an overhaul to the GUI with redundant shortcuts to items that are already easy to activate.
OTOH: If they manage to integrate these shortcuts with trackpad/mouse gestures which are unique to them (ie; don't interfere with other gestures), then I won't mind so much. I love using my trackpad for OS gestures, and this goes right down to my Logitech mouse when I need or want to use it. If it means not having to move my mouse pointer down to the dock and click, because I can just swipe and tap, then that's kind of cool I guess.
I also wouldn't mind it much so long as it doesn't bloat the code and make things run more slowly. Also, full screen apps seems fine to me, nothing harmful in that.
Most of what we're seeing simply looks like GUI enhancements. A very turbo charged exposé and spaces works fine for me. And I really wouldn't worry much about OS X being dumbed down. These 'enhancements" are just that, and are not taking away any of the inherent power which OS X is built upon.
I would however (as said before) would rather see different improvements (better graphics compatibility that would make OS X a real contender in the gaming market anyone?) to the OS but as it stands, I can't imagine being unhappy with anything they do, just so long as they don't take any features away, rather than adding.
Doug