Report back on tests:
System used: Unibody Macbook 2.4GHz, 2Gig Ram, 9400M integrated GPU w/ 256M ram shared with system. 13" Screen, using external 1280x1024 screen. Video drive connected via USB.
1) Motion: Opened existing motion project. Project is a 1080i60 format using 15 still photos. The project is a 3D project with photos scaled to different sizes and at different distances from a single plane. Camera is offset at an angle from the photos to create a somewhat flyby effect. Background is a still image. Total length: 390 frames. Scrubs through fine. Rendered to .mov fine (took a few minutes). Checked different views and had on the screen at the same time 3 views: top, Front, Active camera. Program appeared to work fine for my test.
2) Final Cut Pro: I have already used FCP before on the machine, so I know it works. I used it briefly on this test to be able to use Color. Loaded motion file and placed on the timeline. Once on the timeline, used Send to to send it to Color. Later received back from Color to check again.
3) Compressor: Took the motion export (.mov file, 1080i60), and converted it to a mp4 720p file. Took a few minutes to convert, but the new mp4 played fine. It did push the cpu temp high, but did not cause any system issues in terms of stability.
4) Color: Using file transfered from FCP, I scrubbed the video a little. Added a "film effect", rendered the video and sent it back to FCP. I did try a few color adjustments too, but I really don't know what I'm doing with the software. All of the plot graphs seemed to update and play correctly while the video was being played or scrubbed through. This program requires A LOT of screen real-estate. On the 1280x1024 screen some of the text was near impossible to read because it was so small. If using color, I'd recommend at least a 1680x1050 or higher rez screen (or multiple screens) to see it clearly. I know at home on my 20" 1680x1050, color is easier to see/read.
5) Soundtrack: Created a new project, selected a music loop in one track, added a magazine load into a gun, slide pull/load a round (ie: semiauto handgun), 2x silencer shots w/ 2 shell casings hitting concrete. Total use of 4 tracks (music on 1, magazine, slide, shots on 2, shells on 3 and 4 (for overlap timing)). Exported clip to mp3, worked fine.
6) DVD Studio Pro: Already tested in the past. I know I can create a DVD, add menus content, build and format the dvd just fine.
I can confirm for basic work, Final Cut Studio will work on a machine with a 9400m GPU. I have not tested EVERY feature, but everything I have done has been using HD footage.
Notes:
* Some things will push the cpu up to near 100% usage (compressor used the most cpu power during conversion, most other items had a more distributed spike graph where it would be low then high then medium, etc.) Monitoring of CPU usage and temperature was through iStats. iStats will show all core activity and various temp info.
* Better performance probably would have been obtained if I had more RAM. This machine only has 2Gigs, of which 256Megs is tied into the graphics which only leaves 1.75 Gigs for applications - this makes it a definite challenge to have multiple FCS apps open when dealing with HD video. If I had 4 Gig I feel it would perform better.
* It is definitely slower then a Mac Pro (comparing to my early '08 octo core), but it does work, and it works fairly well (except color which might partially be because I don't understand how to use it). A lot more requires rendering to display rather then real time effects (transitions and video effects in FCP - when you go to select them from the bins, it makes ones that can be done in realtime stand out in bold - there are a lot less bold options on my laptop then on my mac pro - anything not in bold, or even in bold but when placed shows red, will require a render (this isn't a big deal if you render often, but if you wait until you have like 40 things done you may find rendering takes a while).
* Performance would be better if I was working with SD video. This test was all done with 1080i60 HD, so although a short test, it is significantly more system intensive then a similar length test would be in SD.
* Performance would have been better if I had firewire on my Macbook. The Mac Mini you're looking at getting has a FW800 port - if you use that for your video data scratch drive you should get fairly good performance out of it compared to using a USB connection to do video work.
* The Macbook I have does have a bit of a faster processor, but for a lot of what I was doing I didn't see a lot of pegged CPU usage (except in compressor and when doing a few things in motion; color used around 60% during rendering)
* When I refer to CPU usage, I think I should have been more clear - if I say 90% cpu, I'm referring to 90% on EACH CORE.
* The mini and my Macbook are near identical in capability. My Macbook has a faster CPU, but that's really it.
* You will want, if you can afford it, to upgrade your mini to 4Gig.
* All tests done were done with Final Cut Studio 2. Functionality of FCS2 DOES NOT guarantee that when FCS3 comes out that it will still work on the same hardware.
* This test only refers to systems with the 9400m graphics chipset based Macs, and NOT the intel GMA based systems which may not work at all. Also note I did not test EVERY feature of the software tools, but I have used transitions, color adjustments within fcp (using a color video effect adjustment - not that actual Color program), exports, imports, conversion of AVCHD footage, capturing of SD footage via firewire (on my mini before it moved to a different function in my house), etc.
I hope this helps!