• Welcome to the Off-Topic/Schweb's Lounge

    In addition to the Mac-Forums Community Guidelines, there are a few things you should pay attention to while in The Lounge.

    Lounge Rules
    • If your post belongs in a different forum, please post it there.
    • While this area is for off-topic conversations, that doesn't mean that every conversation will be permitted. The moderators will, at their sole discretion, close or delete any threads which do not serve a beneficial purpose to the community.

    Understand that while The Lounge is here as a place to relax and discuss random topics, that doesn't mean we will allow any topic. Topics which are inflammatory, hurtful, or otherwise clash with our Mac-Forums Community Guidelines will be removed.

Apple=German Tank names?

Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
Points
8
Location
Oregon
Your Mac's Specs
MacBook 2 GHz Core Duo ! GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM
Panther, Tiger, and Leopard is this a coincidence? I don't think so. Although I don't support in any way shape or form the Nazi mission I do find in unusual if nothing else that these platforms and tanks share names. But i do find it fitting, because 1. German tanks were better built than there American counter parts. 2. They were vastly out numbered by the American Tanks and 3. were never given the credit due for there revolutionary ideas.

I am sure I have just opened myself up, so let me have it on how i am wrong
 
OP
Likugha
Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
Points
8
Location
Oregon
Your Mac's Specs
MacBook 2 GHz Core Duo ! GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM
Oh good i am not the only crazy one, i thanks for the links
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2007
Messages
140
Reaction score
3
Points
18
no prob ^^.. it is a pretty big coincidence about the German tanks, though, its conceivable that Shaye used the tank names as the inspiration for their product line.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2007
Messages
1,174
Reaction score
23
Points
38
Location
Sydney, Australia
Your Mac's Specs
13" MBP, 2.26GHz, 8gb RAM
Interesting... Don't know the Nazis in that much detail so I wouldn't have made that connection...

Although, apparently the Nazis lost, so let's not spread that rumor...
 
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
9,065
Reaction score
331
Points
83
Location
Munich
Your Mac's Specs
Aluminium Macbook 2.4 Ghz 4GB RAM, SSD 24" Samsung Display, iPhone 4, iPad 2
Meh, so Apple and a company that made tanks happened to think that big cats would make for a neat branding convention...

Big whoop.
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
286
Reaction score
6
Points
18
Location
Doncaster, UK
Your Mac's Specs
MBP, iPad 2 64, 2 x iPod Touch, MBA, 2 x iPhone 3g
One wonders what comes next then as the Leopard II is one of the best tanks around.

I'm looking forward to Apple's Civet, Bobcat, Puma, Siamese, Tonkin and so on - God we are going to have some problems before these appear - although my favourite would have to be OS X Cheetah!
 
Joined
Feb 5, 2008
Messages
874
Reaction score
11
Points
18
Location
Alabama
Your Mac's Specs
Mid 2009 MacBook Pro  Mid 2007 iMac  4G iPod Touch  iPhone 4S  iPad
Well, the one thing you're forgetting is that the Nazis didn't have any tanks, the German Army did. The Nazis were nothing more than a political party, granted, with extreme ideas and wherewithal to force those ideas on others. Hitler, the head of both the Nazi Party in Germany and the German Army, did not name any of the weapons at his disposal.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
Points
8
Perhaps because the German tanks were rolling fortresses. Just like OS X is. :)
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2006
Messages
2,766
Reaction score
232
Points
63
Location
Brooklyn, New York
Your Mac's Specs
15" 2014 MacBook Pro, i7 2.5Ghz, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD; iPad 3, iPhone 6
Panther, Tiger, and Leopard is this a coincidence? I don't think so. Although I don't support in any way shape or form the Nazi mission I do find in unusual if nothing else that these platforms and tanks share names. But i do find it fitting, because 1. German tanks were better built than there American counter parts. 2. They were vastly out numbered by the American Tanks and 3. were never given the credit due for there revolutionary ideas.

I am sure I have just opened myself up, so let me have it on how i am wrong

The analogy falls over with the Tiger though, which was notoriously unreliable. I agree with the comments below that it's unfair to say 'Nazi', as the army and engineers that built these machines were not necessarily Nazis at all.
 
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
9,065
Reaction score
331
Points
83
Location
Munich
Your Mac's Specs
Aluminium Macbook 2.4 Ghz 4GB RAM, SSD 24" Samsung Display, iPhone 4, iPad 2
I actually used to live about 10 minutes away from Krauss-Maffei, the company that made Leopard tanks (and still makes tanks for today's german army).

But if you actually wiki any of the tanks, the nazi theory collapses fairly quickly:
Cheetah: "developed and fielded in the 1970s"
Puma: "First prototypes completed in 1988, with a total of five testbed vehicles being completed by 1990."
Jaguar: "From 1978 and 1982 "
Tiger: Made during WW2
Leopard: production starting in 1965

So apart from Tiger, they're all post-war tanks. So if you retitled this post as "Apple = German engineering fanboys" you might have a point...

Oh yeah, I missed Panther... that one too.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2004
Messages
12,455
Reaction score
604
Points
113
Location
PA
Your Mac's Specs
MacBook
So apart from Tiger, they're all post-war tanks. So if you retitled this post as "Apple = German engineering fanboys" you might have a point...
Which is exactly why the title was changed.
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2006
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
Points
8
I'm not too swift with computers, but I know tanks. I did WWII with the 3rd Armored Division and made it from St. Lo, France to Dessau, Germany. Although I'm only expressing only an opinions here, you can take to the bank.

The German Panther, around 44 tons, armed with a murderously high velocity 75 mm canon was the best tank in Europe — I'd trust my grandmother in it. Can you imagine facing it in a puny 33 ton Sherman which mounted a short barreled mickey mouse 75 mm canon? American tank crews deserved a medal just for getting in a Sherman tank. I actually saw a Panther fire a round through the front of a Sherman, which exited from the rear and destroyed the half-track behind it. Those pictures of knocked out Panthers and Tigers in old WWII pictures were an impressive sight — but those knocked out tanks were knocked out by 500 lb. bombs dropped by P38s and other fighter planes.

The Sherman wasn't without some virtue however, it seemed like we had a million of them, and you never saw one broken down at the side of the road, it was uncommonly reliable and required very little maintenance. Once, we raced a Sherman in a Jeep on a dirt road and clocked it at near 30 mph (the Tiger was reputed to fly up to 12 mph downhill). When we knocked out a Panther, it was Good Night Irene. When a Panther knocked out a Sherman, we had a replacement or two right behind it with brand new crews. American factories cranked out tanks like rabbits on viagra. The most under appreciated soldier in Europe was the American tanker in my opinion (I was armored infantry). It always amazed me how they got anyone to get into a Sherman tank. The five man crews were mostly farm kids who knew tractors.

In the last days of the war, we finally got a match for the Panther, it was the M26 Pershing tank. It went a little better than 40 tons and mounted a wicked 90 mm canon. Google "Tank duel in Cologne" and see the duel on tape — it's breath taking. Our tank won a spectacular victory. Oddly, while that battle was blazing, my platoon was down the street from the cathedral — I didn't know of the duel until after the war.

The German Tiger Royal was a behemoth, a total monster that went 70 tons and mounted the superb and justly famous 88 mm canon which was the gold standard for all canons. With a tank like the Tiger, girl scouts could have won the war and sold all their cookies at the same time except for one thing, it would break down at the drop of a hat and required an army of mechanics to keep it going. During "the Battle if the Bulge" you could see Tiger tanks strewn all over the Ardennes landscape with many never having fired a shot. However, when a Tiger gunner got one off on a Sherman, the 88 mm made a tangled, fiery mess that would make grown man cry.

I've read those stories about Shermans penetrating the side armor of Panthers and winning duels too. I'm not saying they didn't happen. All I'm saying is that if your grandfather fought the war in a Sherman tank, you need to get down on your knees and kiss his feet.
 
Joined
Feb 5, 2008
Messages
874
Reaction score
11
Points
18
Location
Alabama
Your Mac's Specs
Mid 2009 MacBook Pro  Mid 2007 iMac  4G iPod Touch  iPhone 4S  iPad
The analogy falls over with the Tiger though, which was notoriously unreliable. I agree with the comments below that it's unfair to say 'Nazi', as the army and engineers that built these machines were not necessarily Nazis at all.

Correct.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
8,967
Reaction score
287
Points
83
Location
London
Your Mac's Specs
Mac Mini Core i7 2012 | White 2009 MacBook 2 Ghz | 733 Mhz G4 Quicksilver
Panther, Tiger, and Leopard is this a coincidence? I don't think so. . 2. They were vastly out numbered by the American Tanks and 3. were never given the credit due for there revolutionary ideas.

2. They were outnumbered, yes. The Panther was their best tank (better than the overcomplicated Tiger), but they were too well made and difficult to mass produce. Also, Hitler insisted on producing more tanks, with few spare parts, so once one broke down, that was it.

And don't concentrate on American tanks. The panther was a response to the Russian T34 - arguably the best tank of the war. And it was the T34 that destroyed more Panzers than any other tank.

Not given credit? The panther was pretty much the template for most post war tanks, including those built by the Americans, Russians, British and French.

And the Leopard - recently voted the best tank in the world on a BBC documentary is not a Nazi tank, since it is post war.

Still, nice idea - I just wanted to emphasise that the Russians should have credit for slopping armour and the most successful tank of WW2, believe me, the Germans got a nasty surprise when thousands of those turned up on the battlefield
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
4,576
Reaction score
378
Points
83
Location
St. Somewhere
Your Mac's Specs
Mac Studio, M1 Max, 32 GB RAM, 2 TB SSD
Do we foresee an "OS X Panzer"? :D
 
OP
Likugha
Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
Points
8
Location
Oregon
Your Mac's Specs
MacBook 2 GHz Core Duo ! GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM
any other theories besides the 2 that have already been brought up
 
Joined
Apr 9, 2008
Messages
32
Reaction score
2
Points
8
Location
Europe Baby
Your Mac's Specs
Macbook 13.3 inch, white, 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2GB 667 DDR2 SDRAM - 2x1GB,250GB Serial ATA Drive
I live in Berlin - If you're ever here I strongly suggest taking a tour where they will show you alot of bombed out sites from the war, as well as many monuments to the war, as well as hitlers bunker and old Stasi buildings. They keep the bombed out places as a reminder of their past. There is a very famous church in KuDamm where you can see the holes from blast and charred parts of the building. Also peices of the wall are standing where you can take photos and touch it. It's a very intersting city.
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top