Forums
New posts
Articles
Product Reviews
Policies
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Digital Lifestyle
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
Is fast glass with image stabalizing redundant?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CrimsonRequiem" data-source="post: 1142352" data-attributes="member: 62286"><p>Thanks TomTomTunning. I think I'm going to have to rent all three of them for the weekend and do some testing to see which one is the sharpest.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Doug thanks for your insight. I really like how you emphasis the importance of light. I also believe it to be very important. After I master the art of studio lighting I think I may give outdoor photography outside a try. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Thanks Village Idiot, for the rule of thumb. I learned something new.</p><p></p><p>This seems a lot more complicated than I imagined. I'm going to have to test all these things independently from the ground up to see what kind of results I get. Basically trial and error. Oh the joy...>_<"</p><p></p><p>What you said about having it better but not needing it, compared to not having and then needing it is true. >_>" ( Did that make any sense?) <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" /> </p><p></p><p>It's mainly the cost that makes me question it really. I'm not sure if I even need a telephotozoom lens at that focal length? </p><p></p><p>Would it be better to spend my money on some fast prime lenses?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CrimsonRequiem, post: 1142352, member: 62286"] Thanks TomTomTunning. I think I'm going to have to rent all three of them for the weekend and do some testing to see which one is the sharpest. Doug thanks for your insight. I really like how you emphasis the importance of light. I also believe it to be very important. After I master the art of studio lighting I think I may give outdoor photography outside a try. Thanks Village Idiot, for the rule of thumb. I learned something new. This seems a lot more complicated than I imagined. I'm going to have to test all these things independently from the ground up to see what kind of results I get. Basically trial and error. Oh the joy...>_<" What you said about having it better but not needing it, compared to not having and then needing it is true. >_>" ( Did that make any sense?) :P It's mainly the cost that makes me question it really. I'm not sure if I even need a telephotozoom lens at that focal length? Would it be better to spend my money on some fast prime lenses? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Digital Lifestyle
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
Is fast glass with image stabalizing redundant?
Top