Forums
New posts
Articles
Product Reviews
Policies
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Digital Lifestyle
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
Is fast glass with image stabalizing redundant?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bobtomay" data-source="post: 1142233" data-attributes="member: 24160"><p>Am only a beginner here. I have been looking at lenses in the same range you're looking at there. Only thing I can really add, is if you're intending to move to a full frame camera, I'd be looking at the EF 24-70 f/2.8 L or the EF 24-105 f/4 L instead of that EF-S lens. I'm having a tough time trying to decide between these three and have not intention of moving from the APS-C sensor size.</p><p></p><p>Just bought the 70-200 a couple of months ago, used, from a guy doing studio work. He was using the 24-70 exclusively. For a general purpose single carry around, I've already decided the 24-105 is the one that seems to be the go to lens instead of the 17-55.</p><p></p><p>You can probably take this with a grain of salt though, these other guys are def vastly more technically superior with the equipment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bobtomay, post: 1142233, member: 24160"] Am only a beginner here. I have been looking at lenses in the same range you're looking at there. Only thing I can really add, is if you're intending to move to a full frame camera, I'd be looking at the EF 24-70 f/2.8 L or the EF 24-105 f/4 L instead of that EF-S lens. I'm having a tough time trying to decide between these three and have not intention of moving from the APS-C sensor size. Just bought the 70-200 a couple of months ago, used, from a guy doing studio work. He was using the 24-70 exclusively. For a general purpose single carry around, I've already decided the 24-105 is the one that seems to be the go to lens instead of the 17-55. You can probably take this with a grain of salt though, these other guys are def vastly more technically superior with the equipment. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Digital Lifestyle
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
Is fast glass with image stabalizing redundant?
Top