Forums
New posts
Articles
Product Reviews
Policies
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Digital Lifestyle
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
Is fast glass with image stabalizing redundant?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Village Idiot" data-source="post: 1142231" data-attributes="member: 29446"><p>No. I had a decetly unblurred shot at 1/15 with a 70-200 f/2.8L IS.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is wrong depending on the lens. Newer IS lenses tend to have property where the IS will not activate if it senses it's on a tripod or otherwise completely motionless</p><p></p><p></p><p>If the lighting is being done where AC power is easily attained, used Speedotron kits with good power and multiple head can be found for extremely cheap on Ebay. Speedos are work horses and good quality.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Village Idiot, post: 1142231, member: 29446"] No. I had a decetly unblurred shot at 1/15 with a 70-200 f/2.8L IS. This is wrong depending on the lens. Newer IS lenses tend to have property where the IS will not activate if it senses it's on a tripod or otherwise completely motionless If the lighting is being done where AC power is easily attained, used Speedotron kits with good power and multiple head can be found for extremely cheap on Ebay. Speedos are work horses and good quality. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Digital Lifestyle
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography
Is fast glass with image stabalizing redundant?
Top