Forums
New posts
Articles
Product Reviews
Policies
FAQ
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
Switcher Hangout (Windows to Mac)
Best Second hard disk for MBP13 Mid 2009
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MacInWin" data-source="post: 1490953"><p>chscag, I think you are mistaken. From the CCC documentation you can find online The default as it is implemented is for the block copy box to be UNchecked, therefore barring block copy. Furthermore, CCC can clone from one geometry to a different geometry, which is not possible if it uses sector copy. And finally, CCC can generate an archive of changed files, when used as a backup, and pares those archives to make space, much like TM does. For all those reasons, I think CCC copies are NOT sector by sector unless you specifically allow it to do so. Perhaps your impressions were taken from an earlier version?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MacInWin, post: 1490953"] chscag, I think you are mistaken. From the CCC documentation you can find online The default as it is implemented is for the block copy box to be UNchecked, therefore barring block copy. Furthermore, CCC can clone from one geometry to a different geometry, which is not possible if it uses sector copy. And finally, CCC can generate an archive of changed files, when used as a backup, and pares those archives to make space, much like TM does. For all those reasons, I think CCC copies are NOT sector by sector unless you specifically allow it to do so. Perhaps your impressions were taken from an earlier version? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
Switcher Hangout (Windows to Mac)
Best Second hard disk for MBP13 Mid 2009
Top