Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Windows for this...Mac for that?

    Member Since
    Apr 30, 2007
    Location
    Sonoran Desert
    Posts
    78
    Windows for this...Mac for that?
    Well after some time spent trying to replace everything my pc did with a mac, I have found that it is a hopless task, but strangely, I am OK with that.

    Good news or bad? Lets start with the bad:

    CAD: As a mechanical engineer, I am forced to live in a cad world. Autodesk hates apple, and will not make a mac version, so I tried alternatives, including turbocad. When loading up a full size DWG file into turbocad, the program and or computer are overwhelmed. Maybe the program was not written to efficiently handle autocad files to be fair, but that is a no-go. Forget about cad on a macbook. Strange though, because cad runs great on windows laptops with similar specs.

    Gaming: Forget about it! I am not a big gamer, but still enjoy playing Wolfenstein ET now and then, a two year old game that is based on the quake engine. Notchy gameplay with horrible framerates. Gaming on the macbook? NO WAY! Granted, it has integrated graphics, but again pc's with the same specs play it fine. It has to be something about the way OS X functions.

    Adobe Elements: Takes around ONE MINUTE to load the program, very annoying. Works fine otherwise. My pc's have always been able to load full blown photoshop in under 10 seconds. This is a bit upsetting, because you think of a mac going hand in hand with photo editing right? Anyone have any suggestion as to why it would be taking so long? It just doesn't seem right!

    The Good Things:

    For a computer that struggles with the above mentioned things, I am always AMAZED at the 20 second or so startup, as well as fast shut-downs and restarts. Very impressive.

    Call me crazy, but I SWEAR my thoughput speeds are FAR GREATER with the airport than with the wifi on my windows laptops. Big difference for some reason. I don't feel any need to plug my cat 5 in with the macbook, even with large downloads.

    Even on recent pc's I have seen the dreaded BSOD (blue screen of death) all too often, as well as lockups, hangs, and generally quirky behaviour. Windows vista seems like windows 98 all over again in several ways. My pc's take up to 2 minutes to start vista, and they have good specs. The macbook has none of these issues, and I love it so much for that. Seamless performance is a good way to describe the general operation. Easy, no hassles. Doesn't bother me with a message saying that it is connecting to a device or looking for it's drivers, I don't care to hear that noise, just do it. The mac just does it. Networking to windows machines is a breeze.

    When I put in my faster hard drive I was delighted to see that Apple actually gives you operating system disks, something windows machines no longer come with. What a concept. I paid for the license, and I want OS disks in the box, period! Love that it brings in cool air from the speaker ports, and spits out hot air through the keypad. This eliminates overheating from using it on of all places, your lap (see the irony there? laptop?). Very slim, light, modern looking too.

    No virus mess to deal with. Who needs some antivirus bloatware slowing their computer down anyway? Why not just have a secure OS? Why not require a password for major changes? What a no-brainer.

    Freeware actually seems MORE abundant for the mac, than for windows, which is the most surprising thing of all. I can use LEGAL freeware to do things I would have to pay a fortune for with windows, or use some hacked copy. Open office serves all of my needs, and I laugh at microsft for wanting $400 for their office for mac thing. F them! Video, photo and audio editing are all accomplished with ease, and mostly for free (except for elements).

    No need to defrag. On a windows machine, you had better delete temp files and defrag on a regular basis unless you want to slow to a crawl. Not only is this not required on a mac, moving files around is usually a bad thing, that will move hot files, so you just leave everything alone. Beautiful.

    Deleting a program? It can be a real nightmare on a windows machine, to get all the bits and pieces out, and you probably will still have traces in the registry. Mac? Just drag the folder to the trash and it's gone! Love it!

    Verdict: For gaming, or cad work, forget about apple. That isn't what macs are made for. If on the other hand, you want a beautiful machine to do everything else, buy a mac. If you want something that works well, with no hassle, doing the little things you do 99% of the time, internet, mail, document work, media work, buy a mac. DO NOT buy a bloated windows vista pc. Do not curse yourself that way! Buy a PC only if you MUST have it for high end gaming, or AutoCad work. Those are the only reasons I can think of. Come to think of it though, if you love gaming, save yourself some serious money. Don't build that $3000 PC desktop, buy a $300 PS2 and be done with it! I guess that makes more sense anyway huh? As far as the cad issue, Bill Gates should be buying good Christmas presents for the folks at autodesk, because they keep a certain percentage of people tied to windows every year. There is no real alternative there, sadly for myself and some others. Oh and as far as boot camp, I refuse to polute a perfectly good mac with any microsoft products! I refuse! I would rather keep a PC in the corner for that one program.

    The verdict is still out on the adobe elements startup problem. There may be something I could do to improve startup time, so I am reserving judgement at this time. It gets a pass on that one.

    For most people today, a laptop makes the most sense for a "does it all" computer, desktop replacement. You will spend about 1100 for a decent windows laptop, but for a mere $200 more, you could own a far superior machine, a macbook. That should be an easy decision for anyone pondering the choice.

    My main advice? Well as a long time windows power-user, and as someone who has built probably 100 windows machines, as well as microsoft networks, here it is. Don't be afraid to take the leap. It will be a shorter jump, and a softer landing than you might expect. And once you land, you are going to look back and wonder why you waited so long to jump. For all but a small group of specialty users (seem my special needs above), this should be an easy decision, go Mac. Even if you are forced to used a windows machine for certain things, keep it in a corner, and use it for those things. If you can, avoid hooking it up to the internet. Why take the risk. Use it to run the programs that are windows only, and use your mac for everything else. That is exactly what I will be doing. By the way, women love Macs. Mine has no use for a pc now and raves about the Mac.
    Macbook 13" / 320GB 7200 RPM HD 16MB / C2D 2 GHZ / 2GB / Snow Leopard / Boot Camp / XP PRO SP3

  2. #2
    Windows for this...Mac for that?
    walkerj's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 13, 2005
    Location
    New Orleans, LA, USA
    Posts
    1,186
    Specs:
    13" Macbook Pro 2.26Ghz Unibody 4G RAM 160G HDD Superdrive
    Quote Originally Posted by Phoenix Scanner View Post
    Well after some time spent trying to replace everything my pc did with a mac, I have found that it is a hopless task, but strangely, I am OK with that.

    Good news or bad? Lets start with the bad:

    CAD: As a mechanical engineer, I am forced to live in a cad world. Autodesk hates apple, and will not make a mac version, so I tried alternatives, including turbocad. When loading up a full size DWG file into turbocad, the program and or computer are overwhelmed. Maybe the program was not written to efficiently handle autocad files to be fair, but that is a no-go. Forget about cad on a macbook. Strange though, because cad runs great on windows laptops with similar specs.
    Yep. That's a bummer on that. And since CAD stuff is often 3d, you need one of them high end Macs with the higher end graphics cards, run Windows with Bootcamp and do your CADing there.

    Gaming: Forget about it! I am not a big gamer, but still enjoy playing Wolfenstein ET now and then, a two year old game that is based on the quake engine. Notchy gameplay with horrible framerates. Gaming on the macbook? NO WAY! Granted, it has integrated graphics, but again pc's with the same specs play it fine. It has to be something about the way OS X functions.
    Yeah, that's a bummer too. Though UT2004 runs okay on my Macbook (in Universal binary version especially) but that's about the only game I play. Xbox or PS[2|3] for those.

    Adobe Elements: Takes around ONE MINUTE to load the program, very annoying. Works fine otherwise. My pc's have always been able to load full blown photoshop in under 10 seconds. This is a bit upsetting, because you think of a mac going hand in hand with photo editing right? Anyone have any suggestion as to why it would be taking so long? It just doesn't seem right!
    That's most probably because Adobe hasn't come out with a Universal (read Intel) version, and I'm assuming you're using one of the newer Intel Macs. Photoshop (non elements) takes awhile to load on my Macbook too. The next versions should be Universal and load much quicker.

    As far as your good points, yes I've noted that the Airport is not only pretty quick, it's also danged tenacious in picking up wireless access points. There are access points that my Dell can only access in one specific location and only if you hold it up in the air and point it in what is usually an awkward direction while my Macbook grabs and holds any wireless. My entire house is now all wireless.

    And of course I always go with 'right tool for right job' philosophy. I still use Windows for some things (mostly work related) but a Mac is a pretty good tool for about 95% of most people's jobs.

  3. #3
    Windows for this...Mac for that?

    Member Since
    Apr 30, 2007
    Location
    Sonoran Desert
    Posts
    78
    Good point on the issue with elements. Being 4.0 I am sure it was NOT designed to run on the c2d. That would explain that. I don't need it all the time anyway, just for certain special cases where iphoto just doesn't cut it.
    Macbook 13" / 320GB 7200 RPM HD 16MB / C2D 2 GHZ / 2GB / Snow Leopard / Boot Camp / XP PRO SP3

  4. #4
    Windows for this...Mac for that?
    Thyamine's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 23, 2007
    Location
    Coatesville, PA
    Posts
    377
    Specs:
    MBP 15", 2.33 GHz, 2Gb
    I'd also like to point out that if you were really into gaming, you would have wanted a better video environment anyways. I went with the Macbook Pro specifically because I wanted more video memory, and a no shared video memory. I've got both World of Warcraft and Warcraft III installed with the graphics settings cranked up, and they both run fine.

    And as walkerj mentioned, you can always run Boot Camp which would let you see how the game runs in Windows on the exact same hardware.

  5. #5
    Windows for this...Mac for that?

    Member Since
    Mar 31, 2007
    Posts
    81
    Great Post...
    Very nice post.

    As a person whose used Windows ever since college, I can both appreciate and empathize with your points.

    On the airport card, the Macbook uses the Atheros cards, which is considerably better than the default Intel ones residing in PC laptops.

    Hopefully, the next version of CS3 will run a little faster, especially on start-up.

  6. #6
    Windows for this...Mac for that?

    Member Since
    Apr 30, 2007
    Location
    Sonoran Desert
    Posts
    78
    Update on elements. A precise timing showed a 32 second startup time. Not as bad as the first startup was. Still a bit long, but not horrible. I think a version made for intel macs will do much better.
    Macbook 13" / 320GB 7200 RPM HD 16MB / C2D 2 GHZ / 2GB / Snow Leopard / Boot Camp / XP PRO SP3

  7. #7
    Windows for this...Mac for that?

    Member Since
    Oct 04, 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    4
    Specs:
    Mac Pro (Late '08) 2 x 2.8GHz Xeon - 8GB RAM - 2TB HDD - 24" HD HP Monitor
    Right found the answer to the problem.

    Click on System Prefrences > Start Up Disk > Click on the MAC OSX and then restart. From that point onwords no more slow boot-ups due to bootcamp.

  8. #8
    Windows for this...Mac for that?
    knightlie's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 22, 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,463
    Specs:
    Lenovo Z560 Hackintosh -:- '06 iMac -:- iPod Touch 2ndGen
    Err, he was talking about starting Adobe Elements, not the system....
    [URL="http://beadia.net"]Beadia[/URL - Jewelry Business Management Software]
    I judge you when you use poor grammar.

  9. #9
    Windows for this...Mac for that?
    Alexis's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 20, 2006
    Posts
    2,255
    Specs:
    Al iMac 20" 2.4Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo
    Update on elements. A precise timing showed a 32 second startup time. Not as bad as the first startup was. Still a bit long, but not horrible. I think a version made for intel macs will do much better.
    Yep, the full version of Photoshop CS3 takes about 12 seconds to start up. And if you shut it down and start it up again it takes 3 seconds.

  10. #10
    Windows for this...Mac for that?

    Member Since
    Oct 04, 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    4
    Specs:
    Mac Pro (Late '08) 2 x 2.8GHz Xeon - 8GB RAM - 2TB HDD - 24" HD HP Monitor
    Solved the problem of the 'Slow Start-up after uninstalling Boot Camp'.

    Right first open System Prefrences, Then Click On Start Up Disk, Click On The Mac OSX (make sure it's highlighted) and then Click On The Restart Button.

    Now you are free from a 15 to 30 second grey screen of nothing when you start you mac!

  11. #11
    Windows for this...Mac for that?
    knightlie's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 22, 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,463
    Specs:
    Lenovo Z560 Hackintosh -:- '06 iMac -:- iPod Touch 2ndGen
    Quote Originally Posted by AXMattUK View Post
    Solved the problem of the 'Slow Start-up after uninstalling Boot Camp'.

    Right first open System Prefrences, Then Click On Start Up Disk, Click On The Mac OSX (make sure it's highlighted) and then Click On The Restart Button.

    Now you are free from a 15 to 30 second grey screen of nothing when you start you mac!
    You've said this twice - the OP was talking about starting Adobe applications, not starting his Mac.
    [URL="http://beadia.net"]Beadia[/URL - Jewelry Business Management Software]
    I judge you when you use poor grammar.

  12. #12
    Windows for this...Mac for that?
    DSCole312's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 26, 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    77
    Specs:
    Current iPhone and iPod owner, Future Mac Owner
    I'm in the same boat regarding CAD work, so I'm looking to switch from AutoCAD to ArchiCAD when I buy my Mac. (I'm an architect.) Autodesk is every bit as bad as Microsloth when it comes to buggy software and predatory business practices. I wouldn't consider TurboCAD a professional-grade program, but there might be something better out there that can export to DWG format. I understand ArchiCAD works pretty well with DWG files, but it's more for architects than for mechanical engineers. Some other people in my business swear by VectorWorks, but I don't know much about it myself. Check out www.architosh.com.

  13. #13
    Windows for this...Mac for that?
    vaughan80's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jun 14, 2007
    Location
    Lincolnshire, UK
    Posts
    337
    Specs:
    Macbook - 2.4 ghz intel core duo / 4 gig of ram.
    I use Photoshop CS2 on a new imac and it runs like a dream (even before I upgraded the ram). I'm sure it is the adobe elements, have you tried the adobe website for an update or patch?

  14. #14
    Windows for this...Mac for that?
    thedood's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 26, 2007
    Location
    Santa Monica
    Posts
    300
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro 15". 2.4GHz. - 2GB RAM. - 60GB HD@7200 rpm.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phoenix Scanner View Post
    Good point on the issue with elements. Being 4.0 I am sure it was NOT designed to run on the c2d. That would explain that. I don't need it all the time anyway, just for certain special cases where iphoto just doesn't cut it.
    Although Elements will run (albeit sloooow) on a Intel Mac, it is only supported for PC powered Mac's.

    For me, CS3 runs like a dream on my MBP.
    NABET - CWA <the union label.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Triple boot Windows 8, Windows XP, with Mac OSX
    By MacDaddySlim in forum Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-04-2015, 03:48 PM
  2. Triple boot windows 8, windows 7 and mavericks on my Mac
    By TheGoldyMan in forum Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-05-2014, 08:01 PM
  3. Printing from Mac to Windows Server on Windows Domain
    By Thrasonic in forum OS X - Operating System
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-09-2011, 02:49 PM
  4. Mac to Windows networking with a password protected hidden windows share
    By bryan.taylor in forum Internet, Networking, and Wireless
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-14-2008, 04:01 PM
  5. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-20-2006, 08:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •