Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: I only wish...

  1. #1
    I only wish...

    Member Since
    Dec 28, 2009
    Posts
    396
    Specs:
    Macbook Unibody 2.26 Dual, 2GB RAM, 250 GB HDD
    I only wish...
    ...that you could overclock a Macbook.

  2. #2
    I only wish...
    chas_m's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 22, 2010
    Location
    Victoria, BC
    Posts
    18,970
    Specs:
    Mid-2012 MBP (16GB, 1TB HD), Monoprice 24-inch second monitor, iPhone 5s 32GB, iPad Air 2 64GB
    Quote Originally Posted by OnceYouGoMac View Post
    ...that you could overclock a Macbook.
    Not a lot of interest in the Mac community for overclocking -- because enough of us early "pioneer" types found out what happens when you go too far.

    And like someone who owns a motorcycle -- someday you WILL find out what its like when things go funky.

    Not many people feel like risking their $2000 machine for a net <10% gain (generally).

  3. #3
    I only wish...

    Member Since
    Dec 28, 2009
    Posts
    396
    Specs:
    Macbook Unibody 2.26 Dual, 2GB RAM, 250 GB HDD
    lol I understand...and I have owned and messed up many a bike haha. I guess I just wonder, when 3.6 + processors are available, why Mac tends to use such slower ones?

  4. #4
    I only wish...
    CrimsonRequiem's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 24, 2008
    Posts
    6,004
    Specs:
    MBP 2.3 Ghz 4GB RAM 860 GB SSD, iMac 3.4 GHz Intel Core i7 32GB RAM, Fusion Drive 1TB
    Well if you could it would void the warranty. Plus I don't really see the point in overclocking a notebook. A gaming rig, yes.
    死神はリンゴしか食べない。

  5. #5
    I only wish...
    chas_m's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 22, 2010
    Location
    Victoria, BC
    Posts
    18,970
    Specs:
    Mid-2012 MBP (16GB, 1TB HD), Monoprice 24-inch second monitor, iPhone 5s 32GB, iPad Air 2 64GB
    Quote Originally Posted by OnceYouGoMac View Post
    lol I understand...and I have owned and messed up many a bike haha. I guess I just wonder, when 3.6 + processors are available, why Mac tends to use such slower ones?
    1. Price.
    2. Stability.
    3. Heat management.
    4. I presume you are referring to the Pentium 4 560 or the Xeon, but there's really nothing faster than a core i7 out there at the moment (at least, not according to Intel, who make the other 3.6GHz processors referred to above) and the top speed for that is 3.2GHz ... just slightly less than what's used in the iMac.
    5. Which proves that clock rating on the chip ≠ everything.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •