one 2.8 or two 2.8?

Joined
Jan 18, 2008
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Points
1
I've considered to buy the new MP for weeks, and finally come down to choose one 2.8 or two.

I use MP for daily activity, photo editing and potential video editing for my families later and windows.

I want to eliminate the possibility of switching to iMac, even I know iMac will satisfy me too.

Is it worth to add the other processor now for $400+ extra or get it later(same as memory strategies)?

Thanks:Smirk:
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2007
Messages
5,658
Reaction score
159
Points
63
Location
*Brisvegas*
Your Mac's Specs
17 inch 2 GHz C2D imac (5,1) with 3GB DDR2 RAM, X1600 (128MB memory) GPU - OSX 10.6.3
I'm not so sure you can get a 2nd cpu later as they make the mother boards for one or two or whatever when they make your MP. I think someone else will more more about this as I'm only going off what I heard.
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
4,576
Reaction score
378
Points
83
Location
St. Somewhere
Your Mac's Specs
Mac Studio, M1 Max, 32 GB RAM, 2 TB SSD
For $400, I would think it is a good investment. Even if today's software doesn't make use of all 8 cores, tomorrow's may. This is very much related to the $400 number. If that number was, say, $800, my advice would be different, but for $400, you may as well max out your MP for the best future use.
 
Joined
Dec 3, 2006
Messages
9,383
Reaction score
417
Points
83
Location
Irvine, CA
Your Mac's Specs
Black Macbook C2D 2GHz 3GB RAM 250GB HD iPhone 4 iPad 3G
Just like I tell everyone else, get the most machine you can afford.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2008
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Points
1
I dunno, I'm wrestling with this now, and leaning towards one CPU.

The thing is, I'm fairly confident a quad-core will be plenty for my needs, for now (the only computationally-demanding software I'd be running is Logic Pro, and even then, I don't expect to get too crazy with softsynths & effects etc). I'm not into 3D rendering, or video editing, or even heavy-duty Photoshop.

I figure by the time I outgrow a quad-core AND by the time there's more software that can actually use eight cores, that'll be like 3+ years from now, and by then it'll be time to think of a newer MacPro regardless. (interfaces always change... there'll be USB 3.0, and who knows what else... updated SATA, PCIe, firewire standards, etc. etc. etc.). So why spend $400 on something that'll give me close to zero benefit for quite some time? Normally I agree that one should get the best computer you can afford, but... four cores already seems more than plenty.

Am I wrong? Is there lots of software that can already use 8 cores?
 
Joined
Jan 1, 2007
Messages
1,917
Reaction score
87
Points
48
Location
Oz.....near the Wizards home
Your Mac's Specs
iMac 24' 7 Snow Leopard + Parallels and Win 7 | 30 Gb iPod | Canon EOS 400D
I would go one CPU and use the $400 for extra HDD's. As you say, by the time there is enough software out there to justify the 2nd CPU you can buy it then for a fraction of the current $400 or upgrade the whole shebang.
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top