10.5.1: Time Machine Reports Full?

Joined
Jan 15, 2006
Messages
361
Reaction score
14
Points
18
Location
SE Pennsylvania
Your Mac's Specs
20" 2.0GHz Intel Core Duo iMac, 1.5 GHZ PPC Mac Mini, MacBook MB403LL/A
My Time Machine drive is the same size as my internal drive (250 MB), and I have excluded a number of folders. Even so, I understand that TM should continue to do backups as long as space allows, and then seamlessly start purging the oldest backups. This morning I saw a notification that TM required 6.8 GB to do a backup, and only 260 MB was available. So, . . what's up with TM seamlessly managing the space on the TM drive? For lack of a better idea, I just deleted the oldest directory structure on the drive. I can't wait until SuperDuper! 2.1.5 comes out. :Oops:
 
Joined
Jun 20, 2007
Messages
337
Reaction score
11
Points
18
Location
Land of Rising Sun
Your Mac's Specs
MB White 160GB, 2GB RAM,
YOu can check what's occupying the space on your TM drive.

For cloning no need of waiting till superduper comes out. You have two more options... first the native "dd" command and second Carbon Copy Clone...
 
Joined
Dec 3, 2006
Messages
9,383
Reaction score
417
Points
83
Location
Irvine, CA
Your Mac's Specs
Black Macbook C2D 2GHz 3GB RAM 250GB HD iPhone 4 iPad 3G
I have a 140GB Time Machine partition, of which 35GB is still free, covering my 120GB Macbook's hard drive. I haven't excluded any folders, so Time Machine is essentially backing up everything.

My point is that what you're experiencing clearly isn't normal. I wish I could help you out, but I don't know much about Time Machine.
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2007
Messages
5,658
Reaction score
159
Points
63
Location
*Brisvegas*
Your Mac's Specs
17 inch 2 GHz C2D imac (5,1) with 3GB DDR2 RAM, X1600 (128MB memory) GPU - OSX 10.6.3
Maybe drives equal to or smaller than your internal one can't be used for Time Machine properly. I know Apple always said get one 2x or larger then your internal one. Who knows this might be a flaw in the system. As TM is clearly designed for externals larger then the internal to be backed up.
 
OP
geekboy2000
Joined
Jan 15, 2006
Messages
361
Reaction score
14
Points
18
Location
SE Pennsylvania
Your Mac's Specs
20" 2.0GHz Intel Core Duo iMac, 1.5 GHZ PPC Mac Mini, MacBook MB403LL/A
YOu can check what's occupying the space on your TM drive.

For cloning no need of waiting till superduper comes out. You have two more options... first the native "dd" command and second Carbon Copy Clone...

Thanks. Yes, I did browse the TM backups, and via finder deleted somethings that I don't need to be part of the backup (from a week ago, for example). It prompts you with something like "Do you want to delete these files from all backups?". Doing that freed space as well. I have tried CCC in the past, and it appears to work, but I don't get that same "yes, this is exactly what I want" feeling from the UI, that I do from SuperDuper! Both of your mentioned alternatives should work fine though. Thanks again.

Mark
 
OP
geekboy2000
Joined
Jan 15, 2006
Messages
361
Reaction score
14
Points
18
Location
SE Pennsylvania
Your Mac's Specs
20" 2.0GHz Intel Core Duo iMac, 1.5 GHZ PPC Mac Mini, MacBook MB403LL/A
I have a 140GB Time Machine partition, of which 35GB is still free, covering my 120GB Macbook's hard drive. I haven't excluded any folders, so Time Machine is essentially backing up everything.

My point is that what you're experiencing clearly isn't normal. I wish I could help you out, but I don't know much about Time Machine.

Thanks. I appreciate the comment. In my case, I've got about half of my internal 250GB drive free. So, backing up my entire system, would (it seems) take 125GB. Now, incremental daily, weekly changes, etc will take more space, of course. But, I'd think that in my case, even a 160GB drive should serve as a TM drive. Naturally, the number of daily/weeklies would be far fewer, but IMO, it should still be smart enough to just start rolling off the oldest stuff without any intervention on my part. Since my external and internal are the same size, I should have room for a copy of my entire drive, and then just as much space remains (125 GB) for daily/weekly incrementals. Yeah, I'm thinking it's not normal. I'd also like to see Apple provide more options in TM preferences. For example: "Keep a full backup and only ____ add'l weekly/daily backups". Or, "Always leave ________GB free space". As it is now it's pretty much "on" or "off", and "which drive".

Mark
 
Joined
Dec 3, 2006
Messages
9,383
Reaction score
417
Points
83
Location
Irvine, CA
Your Mac's Specs
Black Macbook C2D 2GHz 3GB RAM 250GB HD iPhone 4 iPad 3G
I believe there is a forum post about changing the frequency of the backups or the intervals you want to keep, say instead of hourly backups you only keep daily or weekly backups. This would help cull a lot of the older stuff. I think it's a Terminal command. I'll search around for it and if I do, I'll post it here or link to it
 
OP
geekboy2000
Joined
Jan 15, 2006
Messages
361
Reaction score
14
Points
18
Location
SE Pennsylvania
Your Mac's Specs
20" 2.0GHz Intel Core Duo iMac, 1.5 GHZ PPC Mac Mini, MacBook MB403LL/A
I believe there is a forum post about changing the frequency of the backups or the intervals you want to keep, say instead of hourly backups you only keep daily or weekly backups. This would help cull a lot of the older stuff. I think it's a Terminal command. I'll search around for it and if I do, I'll post it here or link to it

Thanks! I'll hunt around as well. That sounds good!
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top