Mac is like a PDA

Joined
Jul 26, 2004
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Points
6
As I have explored my Mac OS X, I have been struck by the difference in things like installing new programs. For example, today I installed Myst 3: Exile (it's the only one of trilogy that runs natively in OS X and I still haven't been able to locate Classic).

There was no one-click installation. I just copied a file or two over to hard drive and that was it. The same has been true for many other applications, aside from big suites like Adobe and Macromedia.

The comparison that seems the most applicable is that of a Palm OS based PDA. Programs are similarly self-contained and it is simply a matter of dragging them into memory and that's it.

Am I missing something going on behind the scenes here? If I want to make back-ups of specific applications, is it really enough just to drag the actual app onto a CD?
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2004
Messages
442
Reaction score
15
Points
18
Location
Sweden
Your Mac's Specs
2GHz C2D macbook
yep! thats it! (for most of them)
 
OP
Ragle
Joined
Jul 26, 2004
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Wow! That seems like both a throwback to the old days and a giant leap forward, all at the same time. This is especially true for a former PC user who has spent his share of time wading through the registry, trying to either fully uninstall a program or fix one that has gotten itself corrupted.
 
C

Cloudane

Guest
Most of your settings are kept in the Library.. other than that, no horrible registry, ini files etc :)

You can actually 'open up' an application (control-click and 'show package contents') as they're a special folder with other bits inside, but there's no real need to.
 
OP
Ragle
Joined
Jul 26, 2004
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Ok, what are the big suites of software installing then? I am referring to Macromedia, Adobe, and Office. When they were installing, it looked very much like the PC equivalent of putting lots of files in lots of different places.
 
F

flonejek

Guest
They are mainly just archives which extract lots of files to application folders and check your license. Most big suites have an installer soley for license verification purposes, though they may also create a set of default settings in your library folder (most mac apps create those on first run). Adobe is a bit outdated with its install system though, msoffice 2004 has a folder you drag to your apps dir, and it asks you for serial on first run...
 
Joined
Jan 15, 2003
Messages
4
Reaction score
16
Points
3
Location
Whangarei, New Zealand
Your Mac's Specs
Pwnt
Some programs do need files in different places. Especially ones which change system settings (eg 3rd party preference panes). The developers of the big applications probably just decided to make an installer because (1) it looks nice, (2) it's more professional and (3) there might be a few files (system extensions, libraries etc...) that add extra functionality to your computer and won't work if you just put them anywhere.

About 'finding classic' - it's not really an application, as such. You don't double click a file to open it - it's in your system preferences and runs in the background after you've started it. If you try to open an application that isn't compatible with OSX, classic will start up automatically (or ask you if you want to start it up). You can also set your computer to start up classic when you log in, and/or have Classic's status shown in the menu bar. Go to System Preferences > Classic.
 
V

VastDeathmaster

Guest
Being a computer "old-timer", I compare OSX (loosely) to Windows 3.1.

Win3.1 didn't have drag and drop except for the most compact programs. But deleting a program was far simpler then than now.


There are a few programs out there for the Mac that are not simple drag and drop. Open Office for one.
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2004
Messages
1,779
Reaction score
65
Points
48
Location
Luxemburg, Europe
Your Mac's Specs
PowerMac G5 Dual 2GHz (June 2004), 2.5GB, Airport, black 5G iPod 30GB, white MacBook 2.0 2GB
VastDeathmaster said:
Being a computer "old-timer", I compare OSX (loosely) to Windows 3.1.

Win3.1 didn't have drag and drop except for the most compact programs. But deleting a program was far simpler then than now.


There are a few programs out there for the Mac that are not simple drag and drop. Open Office for one.

I consider a myself as a computer "old-timer" too (ages before Windows... :D ), but comparing OS X to Win3.1?!...hmm... very strange comparison.

The drag-and-drop feature to install/remove programs is surely quite old (it was on old Macs even BEFORE Windows), but unlike Microsoft, Apple always kept that way of installation because it IS the easiest and less messy way to do that. They never needed a registry, that's a Microsoft invention, in my opinion the worst thing they ever "invented"!

But I agree with you that there are some programs that need a little more than just drag and drop, although I think that OpenOffice is a bad example, because it isn't really OS X native, it needs the X11 window manager to run.
But, unlike Windows, the things some applications leave behind after removing don't affect the system itself...they just take space on the harddisk.
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top