Core Duo vs. Core 2 Duo?

Joined
Jun 25, 2007
Messages
225
Reaction score
3
Points
18
Your Mac's Specs
2.26 13" MBP, WD 7200 RPM 320GB HDD, 4GB RAM; 2 EDU iBook G4s, 4g nano, 16GB 2g Touch, shuffle
What are the differences between Core Duo and Core 2 Duo? Can you run Windows on both? If you're not a heavy graphics user and just do basic internet/word processing/iTunes on the comp, would you notice a difference? And is it worth buying a Core Duo to save money?

Thank you!
 
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Location
Arlington VA
Your Mac's Specs
MacBook Pro 2.6 w/4 gigs, Mac Pro Dual Quad 2.8's with 16 gigs of Ram, iMac 21" i5
There are a few differences, mainly performance. Core Duo was the original dual core chip, and is only 32 bit. The Core 2 Duo is a 64 bit chip. The 64 bit chip run faster. Windows and OSX can run on both machines. I have heard, but had no first hand experience that the Core Duo ran much hotter than the Core 2 Duo's. Hope that helps.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
780
Reaction score
18
Points
18
Your Mac's Specs
20" iMac Core 2 Duo 2.16Ghz, 500GB HDD, 1GB RAM, 128MB ATI Radeon X1600
Leopard is going to be completely 64 bit. Although it will run on Core Duo, it won't be as fast.
 

Gav


Joined
Dec 24, 2006
Messages
118
Reaction score
2
Points
18
If you can spring for Core 2 Duo, you will get the following benefits:

- 64-Bit Processor, will run Leopard/XP 64Bit (And 32Bit) perfectly.
- A more powerful chip, not only do they have higher clock speeds, but due to the architecture and whatnot, also a better performer in general.

However the only downside to Core 2 Duo would be that because it is 64-Bit, it will not run 16-Bit Applications. Not a problem if your using Mac OS X, but if you boot into Windows, you'll find that quite a few programs still use 16-Bit installers.

Overall though, Core 2 Duo would be better if you can afford it, if not Core Duo is fine. My Core Duo 1.83Ghz iMac can handle 1080p HD playback with considerable ease, and 720p beautifully (heck, I can even use expose with live 720p footage :D). (Again, can I point out - I am selling this iMac - see sig :))
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2007
Messages
255
Reaction score
14
Points
18
Location
Miami
Your Mac's Specs
15" MBP 2.2ghz SR!
However the only downside to Core 2 Duo would be that because it is 64-Bit, it will not run 16-Bit Applications. Not a problem if your using Mac OS X, but if you boot into Windows, you'll find that quite a few programs still use 16-Bit installers.

Doesn't this depend on whether the Windows OS is 32-bit or 64-bit, and not the processor? I don't think there would be a problem as long as the OS isn't 64-bit, which almost none of them are still.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
780
Reaction score
18
Points
18
Your Mac's Specs
20" iMac Core 2 Duo 2.16Ghz, 500GB HDD, 1GB RAM, 128MB ATI Radeon X1600
flilow06 is right.
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2005
Messages
3,231
Reaction score
112
Points
63
Location
On the road
Your Mac's Specs
2011 MBP, i7, 16GB RAM, MBP 2.16Ghz Core Duo, 2GB ram, Dual 867Mhz MDD, 1.75GB ram, ATI 9800 Pro vid
If you're not a heavy graphics user and just do basic internet/word processing/iTunes on the comp, would you notice a difference?
I suspect not. None of those really challenge even the lowly Mac mini or low end iMac.

Unless you are thinking of buying used, the only current Apple machine with Core Duo is the Mac mini. The rest of the machines use Core 2 Duo or better. Perhaps your real concern is about the graphics system. That will affect a "heavy graphics user" much more.
 
Joined
Apr 20, 2006
Messages
2,255
Reaction score
47
Points
48
Your Mac's Specs
Al iMac 20" 2.4Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo
Bear in mind the Core Duo is still a fine processor and is in no way a slouch.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2006
Messages
1,611
Reaction score
72
Points
48
Location
Southern California
Your Mac's Specs
Unibody MBP 2.4 GHz C2D/27" Core i7 iMac
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
199
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Your Mac's Specs
MacBook CoreDuo 1.25Gb Ram WiFi'd To Airport Extreme!
i heard with os 10.5, it will run slow with core duo macs
 
Joined
Apr 20, 2006
Messages
2,255
Reaction score
47
Points
48
Your Mac's Specs
Al iMac 20" 2.4Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo
Which would mean it would run badly with G5s and G4s too.

I can't see Apple's next OS only working well if you bought a Mac in the last 9 months.
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2005
Messages
3,231
Reaction score
112
Points
63
Location
On the road
Your Mac's Specs
2011 MBP, i7, 16GB RAM, MBP 2.16Ghz Core Duo, 2GB ram, Dual 867Mhz MDD, 1.75GB ram, ATI 9800 Pro vid
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
199
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Your Mac's Specs
MacBook CoreDuo 1.25Gb Ram WiFi'd To Airport Extreme!
ya i heard that cuz the core duos are 32 bit and os 10.5 is a 64 bit operating system
so its not true then?
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2005
Messages
3,231
Reaction score
112
Points
63
Location
On the road
Your Mac's Specs
2011 MBP, i7, 16GB RAM, MBP 2.16Ghz Core Duo, 2GB ram, Dual 867Mhz MDD, 1.75GB ram, ATI 9800 Pro vid
ya i heard that cuz the core duos are 32 bit and os 10.5 is a 64 bit operating system
so its not true then?
I would expect Apple has figured out the technical details. Probably when you install or start up OS X it will know what type of system it is on and adjust accordingly. With 22+ million OS X users that are mostly 32bit systems Apple has to make sure performance is a good as it can be on both. Expect the best.
 
Joined
Dec 24, 2006
Messages
508
Reaction score
15
Points
18
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Your Mac's Specs
1.5ghz Powerbook G4 17" 2gb RAM
I would expect Apple has figured out the technical details. Probably when you install or start up OS X it will know what type of system it is on and adjust accordingly. With 22+ million OS X users that are mostly 32bit systems Apple has to make sure performance is a good as it can be on both. Expect the best.

I dont think that Leopard is going to run great, if at all, on the G3's, but it will run just fine on the G4's and G5's...

*edit - although wikipedia is not always the best information: here it is:

Like Mac OS X 10.4, Leopard will support both PowerPC and Intel Macs. However, Leopard will not be released in separate versions, but instead will comprise one universal release that will run on either processor.[34] While it is known that Leopard will support PowerPC G4 and PowerPC G5 processors, support for the PowerPC G3 is reportedly not present in the pre-release versions which have been made available to developers.[35] When Apple’s Leopard website first appeared online, the 64-bit section stated, "From G3 to Xeon, from MacBook to Xserve, there is just one Leopard." The sentence was removed from the page the following day, leaving open the question of whether Leopard will support Macs with G3 processors.[36] In the past, each new major release of Mac OS X has dropped support for at least some older Macs; 10.3 dropped support for Macs without built-in USB ports, and 10.4 dropped support for computers without FireWire ports.
 
Joined
Mar 14, 2005
Messages
443
Reaction score
3
Points
18
Location
Atlanta, GA
Your Mac's Specs
17" Macbook Pro Unibody 2.66 Ghz and Powerbook G4 1.67 GHz 2.0GB RAM
I would expect Apple has figured out the technical details. Probably when you install or start up OS X it will know what type of system it is on and adjust accordingly. With 22+ million OS X users that are mostly 32bit systems Apple has to make sure performance is a good as it can be on both. Expect the best.

Why are most of them 32-bit systems? I thought recent PPC was 64-bit compatible. If that is true, wouldn't a lot people be on 64-bit, probably as many as 32-bit since the intel 32-bit processors didn't last very long in the successful lines of mac hardware (mbp, mb, imac)?

PPC users + C2D = All of the 64-bit
Intel Core Duo + Old PPC = All 32 - bit

Which is more?
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
238
Reaction score
6
Points
18
Your Mac's Specs
iMac 17" Intel Core Duo, 2 GB RAM + 20" ACD
It really doesn't matter if 'only' a few million people are running 32 bit machines- Leopard will work perfectly on 32 bit machines. Apple isn't going to shaft those who bought the Core Duo Intel systems less than a year ago. Yes, the 64 bit machines can use more RAM and such, but it won't be slow on the 32s.
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2005
Messages
3,231
Reaction score
112
Points
63
Location
On the road
Your Mac's Specs
2011 MBP, i7, 16GB RAM, MBP 2.16Ghz Core Duo, 2GB ram, Dual 867Mhz MDD, 1.75GB ram, ATI 9800 Pro vid
PPC users + C2D = All of the 64-bit
Intel Core Duo + Old PPC = All 32 - bit

Which is more?
First note that G3, G4 and G5 are all referred to as PPC chips. Out of those, only the G5 is 64bit.

Lets look at the introduction dates for G4s and 64bit Apple systems. I'm going to assume Apple will not be supporting G3 systems, although we don't really know that officially yet.

When did things go G4;
G4 Powerbook - Jan 2001.
G4 iBook - Oct 2003.
iMac G4 - Jan 2002.
PowerMac G4 - Oct 1999.
Mac mini G4 - Jan 2005, replace with Intel 32bit Jan 2005.
There is also the Cube and the eMac.

When did things go 64bit;
Macbook Pro - Oct 2006.
Macbook - Oct 2006.
G5 iMac - Oct 2005, downgraded to 32bit Intel Jan 2006, upgraded to 64bit Intel Sep 2006.
G5 Powermac - Aug 2003. Replaced with the Mac Pro (64bit) Aug 2006.

In the "second quarter ended March 31, 2007 Apple shipped 1,517,000 Macintosh® computersr, representing 36 percent growth in Macs over the year-ago quarter". That means for the same period a year earlier they only sold about 1.1 million Macs. The numbers are going up, but not enough to have eclipsed the 32bit systems, yet.
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top