• Welcome to the Off-Topic/Schweb's Lounge

    In addition to the Mac-Forums Community Guidelines, there are a few things you should pay attention to while in The Lounge.

    Lounge Rules
    • If your post belongs in a different forum, please post it there.
    • While this area is for off-topic conversations, that doesn't mean that every conversation will be permitted. The moderators will, at their sole discretion, close or delete any threads which do not serve a beneficial purpose to the community.

    Understand that while The Lounge is here as a place to relax and discuss random topics, that doesn't mean we will allow any topic. Topics which are inflammatory, hurtful, or otherwise clash with our Mac-Forums Community Guidelines will be removed.

Car - Brake Question

Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
3,978
Reaction score
99
Points
48
Location
Chicago, IL
Your Mac's Specs
Quad 2.8GHz Mac Pro, Edge iPhone
So, Memorial weekend I went with my gf to visit her parents in Kentucky. Her parents are actually really cool and she has a '79 Formula Firbird in mint shape. I mean, her dad told me to rev the engine in the park to try and scare everyone.
It was my first time driving a muscle car and it wasn't as cool as I thought it'd be but I didn't wanna burn out in it. It didn't seem to have the power I was expecting either....
Anyways, the brake pedal did not have any give. It had about 2" from it's normal state to full depressed. And if I had to assume, there is no way that car could stop in an emergency. It could not stop fast at all.
I am used to driving a Honda del Sol (similar to a Civic but a 2 seater) which is a lot smaller and lighter. I assume I don't have any sort of power braking system seeing the Sol doesn't even have power steering and assume there is some kind of assist on the 'bird. Maybe just because I literally have a ton less to stop, I am just used to stopping a lot easier.
Is there something wrong with the brakes? Is it just me?
Any help would be appreciated.
Bryan
 
Joined
May 3, 2007
Messages
724
Reaction score
18
Points
18
Location
Seattle
It's possible he has steel braided lines and different brake fluid. When I changed mine on my old wrx it stiffened up the brake pedal significantly. It could be too that it's old and doesn't have as much give as you're used too.
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2006
Messages
312
Reaction score
17
Points
18
Location
Texas
Your Mac's Specs
Mac mini i5, 2.3Ghz dual core, 8 GB RAM, OSX 10.8.2
It's just you. The brake pedal isn't supposed to have all that much play.
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Messages
4,934
Reaction score
207
Points
63
Location
Anytown, USA
Your Mac's Specs
27" iMac 2.7GHz Core i5, iPhone 6, iPad Air 2, 4th gen Apple TV
People usually are really thrown off driving an old car when used to driving newer cars. They feel is a lot different. My Mustang has drum brakes and no power, which I can definitely feel when I hit the brake, but I know if I push it all the way down the wheels would lock up and it will stop just fine. (I've had to do it before :) )

I imagine your car has power brakes and his 'bird probably doesn't That can feel a LOT different, just like the difference in manual and power steering.

My '65 Mustang drives like a tank and is a little rougher keeping going straight down the road, but I just love it!
 

eric


Retired Staff
Joined
Nov 4, 2006
Messages
8,704
Reaction score
447
Points
83
Location
twin cities, mn, usa
as far as the power goes, the fact that it's a '79 has everything to do with it.
even corvettes of the late '70s were pretty anemic.
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
1,964
Reaction score
174
Points
63
as far as the power goes, the fact that it's a '79 has everything to do with it.
even corvettes of the late '70s were pretty anemic.
Yeah. Everything cars was scaled back. It was the era of down-sizing, engine crippling, gas lineups and 55 mph speed limits.
It didn't seem to have the power I was expecting either....
Does it have an automatic or standard transmission? If it has a 350-cubic-inch engine and an auto transmission, it would never have been the fastest knife in the drawer.
Anyways, the brake pedal did not have any give. It had about 2" from it's normal state to full depressed.
Two inches is about normal. The assist would be much greater than it is in newer cars, as it would the power steering. Fashions change. Measure the travel in any newer car.
And if I had to assume, there is no way that car could stop in an emergency. It could not stop fast at all.
From memory, the thing has front disc brakes and rear drums. It would stop fast in an emergency, but as you say, not as quickly as a car weighing a ton less and with four-wheel discs. But you couldn't have tried an emergency-stop experiment in someone else's car.
. . . and assume there is some kind of assist on the 'bird.
I doubt anything GM made by '79 didn't have power brakes, with the possible exception of Chevettes.
Is there something wrong with the brakes? Is it just me?
Any help would be appreciated.
All in all, if the car is kept in good shape, there's probably nothing wrong with them — compared with the rest of the outdated technology, even in '79, that GM and all the other domestic car makers used.

My Google-fu seems to be lacking today. I can't find any Formula performance specifications on the web. I found these Firebird Trans-Am performance stats, but nothing about braking.
Overall, the 1977-79 T/A 6.6 Firebirds, were good for 15.30 - 15.50’s seconds @ 90-94 mph quarter-mile times straight off the showroom floor. The 1978 cars with 4-speed manual transmissions may be slightly quicker due to the use of 3.42 rear gears. It has been shown with minor tuning, high 14-sec quarter mile times are within reach.
And I found this page on the Trans-Am with the 400-cubic-inch engine. Nothing about brakes.
 
OP
bryphotoguy
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
3,978
Reaction score
99
Points
48
Location
Chicago, IL
Your Mac's Specs
Quad 2.8GHz Mac Pro, Edge iPhone
Thanks everyone for the help.
I can't say I was expecting much. I knew going into it I'd be a little dissapointed because I knew it was a 4-speed automatic. And with it being an older muscle car, it'd have a decent engine but way too much just to restrict its power.
Next time I will just have to have a little more fun with it I guess. Maybe race it against my car (off the streets) for a little excitement.
btw, the base Sol has front disc and rear drum.
I guess I just need to remember it's older and the tech. isn't all there. I did enjoy the looks more than I do in my Sol though.
Bryan

Here's a pic of the 'bird:
IMGP7629imp.jpg
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
101
Reaction score
5
Points
18
Your Mac's Specs
1.67ghz powerbook G4, 1GB RAM, 100GB HD.
The brakes will only have a problem *usually* if they feel slack. As long as it resists your foot when you press on it, it should be fine.
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
219
Reaction score
6
Points
18
Location
San Jose, CA/Manoa,HI
Your Mac's Specs
13' Black MacBook Core Duo 1.25 GB Ram 80GB HD
The brakes on older cars are stiffer, they were like that on my 67 ss camaro. They were probably drum brakes which are horrible.
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top