Cisco owns trademark for iPhone

Joined
Jan 8, 2007
Messages
28
Reaction score
2
Points
3
Your Mac's Specs
iPod 8GB Nano
Report from the San Jose Mercury News - Full story here: http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/16425178.htm

iPhone has been the rumored name for Apple's cell phone effort for years. The company reportedly registered the iPhone.org domain name in 1999. But Cisco acquired a company that has owned the U.S. trademark since 1999.

THIS could be interesting, especially after Apple's tangle with Creative.
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2003
Messages
4,915
Reaction score
68
Points
48
Location
Mount Vernon, WA
Your Mac's Specs
MacBook Pro 2.6 GHz Core 2 Duo 4GB RAM OS 10.5.2
Yeah I was wondering what was going to come from this.. I guess we'll see.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2005
Messages
6,188
Reaction score
254
Points
83
Location
New Jersey
Your Mac's Specs
Mac Pro 8x3.0ghz 12gb ram 8800GT , MBP 2.16 2GB Ram 17 inch.
intersting read... they will settle but I think apples stock will take a hit of a few dollars tomorrow when the investors hear about it, I think the stock will rebound though by the next day.
 
Joined
Feb 27, 2005
Messages
940
Reaction score
59
Points
28
Location
Framingham, MA
Your Mac's Specs
MacBook C2D 2.4 2GB
I see 2 options here...

- Apple buys/gets permission from Cisco to use the name.
- On the they of the iPhone's release it will recieve a new name, probably Apple Phone, just like the iTV, i mean Apple TV.
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2006
Messages
111
Reaction score
3
Points
18
Location
Bonnie Scotland
Your Mac's Specs
Macbook: 2.00Ghz C2D, 2GB RAM, 120GB HD
To be honest I feel that this is very pathetic on Cisco's part. They say that they are wanting to protect their own trademark when the name is an obvious copy of apple's main franchises.

It's like the people who buy domains like w.ps3.org (outdated link removed) and things as soon as the ps3 is announced simply so they can sell them on to people who actually want to make sites.

Although they do have a product it's a pretty crap one which doesn't really deserve the name.
 
Joined
Jan 12, 2005
Messages
670
Reaction score
23
Points
18
Location
Ceres, Ca
Your Mac's Specs
iPad 32 GB 3G
To be honest I feel that this is very pathetic on Cisco's part. They say that they are wanting to protect their own trademark when the name is an obvious copy of apple's main franchises.

It's like the people who buy domains like w.ps3.org (outdated link removed) and things as soon as the ps3 is announced simply so they can sell them on to people who actually want to make sites.

Although they do have a product it's a pretty crap one which doesn't really deserve the name.

The trademark dates back to before Apple began using the iName branding, and that practice, putting a lower case i or e before a product name is hardly an Apple invention. It seems that Apple users can be somewhat insular in this regard, not knowing much about the industry as a whole, and then end up thinking Apple is being copied by companies that had products and names out prior to Apple making use of something similar. Just because Apple has two successful products using a certain naming scheme that they didn't originate doesn't mean that they are entitled to any other similar name now.

Cisco is a large, well established company that is worth many times over what Apple is, so they hardly need to resort to any backhanded tactics to earn a little extra cash. The truth is Apple had asked for the trademark and was in talks with Cisco for a license when they just decided they'd use it anyway, claiming that they were different products and wouldn't compete directly. Now Apple has had good luck bullying companies in this fashion before, but I seriously doubt that Cisco will roll over and take it. First of all, Apple has much more to lose here than Cisco, and already Cisco can claim damages for dilution of trademark due to Apple's actions-- first negotiating in bad faith and then making a major announcement when they had obviously agreed that Cisco owned the trademark (implicitly, you wouldn't be in talks to buy the rights if you didn't think that they owned the trademark, would you?) And since Cisco (Linksys branded), already has an iPhone product on the market, they are obviously using the trademark, aren't they?

In particular, I see a real problem due to one simple fact. The iPhone (Apple) can run dashboard widgets, and there is a Skype widget available. Couple that with the built in 802.11x and you've got Skype phone functionality, which is what the iPhone (Cisco) is-- a Skype phone. Apple is competing directly with Cisco, using a trademark that they don't have rights to, but Cisco does, and has had rights to since before the iPod was ever invented. Do you think that's going to fly in court?
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2006
Messages
111
Reaction score
3
Points
18
Location
Bonnie Scotland
Your Mac's Specs
Macbook: 2.00Ghz C2D, 2GB RAM, 120GB HD
I did a bit of research into the iPhone. it was origonally released in 1997 and was never a popular product.

The trademark was never used again until 2006

How popular were iPods in 2006? Very. It's quite obvious that this is the only reason they resurrected the trademark.
 
Joined
May 12, 2005
Messages
539
Reaction score
17
Points
18
Location
Washington
Your Mac's Specs
Macbook Pro 2.6 GHz, 4 GB, 200 GB, 256MB Vid
here is my own bit of research:

The USPTO record shows that Infogear Technology Corporation originally applied for the trademark on March 20, 1996. The mark was "published for opposition" on December 29, 1998 and officially recorded (registered) as a trademark on November 16, 1999. The "last listed owner" of the mark is listed as "Cisco Technology, Inc."

for those of the i-whatever persuasion:

Ipod-- Introduced in 2001.
Imac-- Introduced in 1998

Iphone trademark-- 1996

now i get lost when trying to understand the actual law of trademark names, and i just get confused and have to lie down for a while. i will leave it to the trade lawyers and courts to figure out who is right.
for now, my money is not on apple..............
 
Joined
Jan 12, 2005
Messages
670
Reaction score
23
Points
18
Location
Ceres, Ca
Your Mac's Specs
iPad 32 GB 3G
I did a bit of research into the iPhone. it was origonally released in 1997 and was never a popular product.

The trademark was never used again until 2006

How popular were iPods in 2006? Very. It's quite obvious that this is the only reason they resurrected the trademark.

So it's obvious, so what? That doesn't entitle Apple to every name that starts with a lowercase i.
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2004
Messages
10,345
Reaction score
597
Points
113
Location
Margaritaville
Your Mac's Specs
3.4 Ghz i7 MacBook Pro (2015), iPad Pro (2014), iPhone Xs Max. Apple TV 4K
Read THIS.

Little is ever as it seems. Now we know why Steve went ahead.
 

rman


Retired Staff
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
12,637
Reaction score
168
Points
63
Location
Los Angeles, California
Your Mac's Specs
14in MacBook Pro M1 Max 32GB 2TB
Interesting read.
 
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
80
Reaction score
2
Points
8
Location
Asheville, NC
Your Mac's Specs
iMac Alum 20'' 2.4GHz | iMac G4 | iPod Silver Nano 2GB
Yeah, would't worry about Apple, I'm sure they have every loop hole clearly thought out. Also, to whomever said this "Cisco is a large, well established company that is worth many times over what Apple is" quite a bold statement to make considering the market share these days eh?
 
Joined
Jan 12, 2005
Messages
670
Reaction score
23
Points
18
Location
Ceres, Ca
Your Mac's Specs
iPad 32 GB 3G
Also, to whomever said this "Cisco is a large, well established company that is worth many times over what Apple is" quite a bold statement to make considering the market share these days eh?

Not really. Cisco is the richest company in Silcon Valley. They sell vastly different products then Apple, obviously. Cisco's market cap is ~ $175 billion, while Apple's is ~ $81 billion, market cap being defined as what a company is worth. So Cisco is worth more than double of what Apple is. Maybe not quite "many times over," but Cisco is a bigger company than Apple. I was just pointing that out because of the people suggesting that Cisco was just some little company trying to grab a little money in the sue fest that is the American corporate business scene these days. And frankly, since Apple is one of the most sue happy big corporations around, I don't see how people have room to complain.
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top