Another Software Question: Open Office

Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
304
Reaction score
6
Points
18
Location
dodo island
Your Mac's Specs
ibook g4, 14'', 1.33 Ghz, 60gig, 768ram, Mac OsX 10.4.3
just a free alternative to Microsoft Office.
I will say it's alright. I have been using it a little bit on PC though.
it's just fine if you have to open word office & powerpoint documents which u receive from clients etc.. but workwise, microsoft office is the way to go.
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2003
Messages
4,915
Reaction score
68
Points
48
Location
Mount Vernon, WA
Your Mac's Specs
MacBook Pro 2.6 GHz Core 2 Duo 4GB RAM OS 10.5.2
It works really well.. I prefer NeoOffice since it opens a bit quicker and is a little bit friendlier.
 
Joined
Jul 23, 2004
Messages
3,169
Reaction score
164
Points
63
Location
North NJ
Your Mac's Specs
i dont have no mac's
it works its a nice program i used it for a while but under my circumstances i went back to office
 
OP
N

natoryy

Guest
NeoOffice? I googled it and it's free too...so tell me about it? Is it good as well?


And I want a really good word processing system. One that is fast, decently fantastic and compatible with a Mac and clean...and will transfer easily to a Windows PC for printing.
Should I get open office, neo office, iWork or Microsoft Office. Pros/cons to any of the choices?
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2003
Messages
4,915
Reaction score
68
Points
48
Location
Mount Vernon, WA
Your Mac's Specs
MacBook Pro 2.6 GHz Core 2 Duo 4GB RAM OS 10.5.2
It's open office also just not the latest version of openoffice plus it does not have any of the X11 dependencies. So you'll get all your aqua menus etc that you are used to. Eventually they will update it to use open office 2.x code, but until then it uses the previous release of open office as it's base code.

Open Office is the best and most compatible with everything out there.. has a lot of functionality, but has X11 dependencies and is not aquafied. Free. Slow to bootup, but nice once it's open.

Neo office based on older open office code, but is still really nice, and does not have the X11 dependencies, will work with all MS Office files again, save and edit. Free. Not as slow as Oo when booting, but still slow

iWork I've never used so I can't really tell you much of it. But I know it costs.

MS Office, expensive. Opens quickly and is compatible with itself and other file formats, bulky. Is not compatiable with saving in the open office format.
 
OP
N

natoryy

Guest
Slow to boot...like how slow?

And...I'm not exactly tech-savvy. What's X11.

And just making sure - The docs transfer fine from Mac to PC?
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2003
Messages
4,915
Reaction score
68
Points
48
Location
Mount Vernon, WA
Your Mac's Specs
MacBook Pro 2.6 GHz Core 2 Duo 4GB RAM OS 10.5.2
It just takes awhile to startup.. with Oo it's about 20-40 seconds and NeoOffice is about 20 seconds, so not a long time, but it is a bit slower than MS Office to open up. You will probably not want to use Oo if you are not tech savvy then unless you are good at followign directions and you would like to install X11, which several people on this forum has had a hard time with it so far :)

So I would use NeoOffice if I was you. You can open PC/Mac/*nix versions of .doc files and save .doc files that can be opened on all also, so you'll not have a problem there. If you save as an Open office document though, you'll need to convert to a word document when transferring over.
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top