Power without the price tag?

Joined
Sep 12, 2017
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Hi all, both me and my wife are self-employed designers and have been using desktop Macs for the last 20 years. My first Mac was a 7200/90 and between us we’ve had every iteration of iMac going. My wife works in magazine publishing and needs a lot of power to cope with the graphic-heavy layouts and colossal file sizes that are standard these days.

From day one, her current iMac (see spec below) hasn’t quite cut it. I suspect it’s the pressure on the system of rendering a 5K screen. Basically, we’re nervous about shelling out thousands on another iMac that appears on paper to have only slight improvements on her 3 year old model.

Current:
iMac Retina 5K 27", late 2014
3.5Ghz Intel Core i5
16GB 1600 Mhz DDR3
1.12TB Fusion drive
AMD Radeon R9 M290X 2048MB

Current top of the range:
iMac Retina 5K 27", late 2017
3.8Ghz Intel Core i7
64GB 2400 MHz DDR4
2TB Fusion drive
Radeon Pro 580 with 8GB of VRAM
£2,624 ($3,482)

Other options include moving to a Mac Pro (although these are to be phased out) or wait for the iMac Pro, but prices start at £3,760 ($5,000).

Just wondered if anyone had any suggestions for getting the most out an Apple desktop without breaking the bank?

Thanks!
 
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
10,739
Reaction score
1,189
Points
113
Location
Rhode Island
Your Mac's Specs
M1 Mac Studio, 11" iPad Pro 3rd Gen, iPhone 13 Pro Max, Watch Series 7, AirPods Pro
In my opinion, the VRAM will have the most impact on performance for 5K video file work. I see you going from 2GB to 8GB as a huge step up in performance. Of course, the processor has been upgraded, which will also help with the processing speed while working with those 5K video files.
 

IWT


Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
10,285
Reaction score
2,227
Points
113
Location
Born Scotland. Worked all over UK. Live in Wales
Your Mac's Specs
M2 Max Studio Extra, 32GB memory, 4TB, Sonoma 14.4.1 Apple 5K Retina Studio Monitor
I agree with Bob. The huge jump in VRAM and the much more modest hike in RAM from 16GB to 64GB (even to 32GB) along with a better CPU would make things zip along.

And just for comment - not suggesting that route - what you quote as the current "top of the range" is not entirely true because you could choose any of the SSD/Flash storage options which are very expensive, but have some speed advantage. (See my specs under my avatar on the left).

Ian
 
OP
B
Joined
Sep 12, 2017
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Hi chaps, thanks for your help. Most of our work is in Photoshop and InDesign, but I'm assuming the increased VRAM would help speed these apps up too?

To avoid clogging up the hard drive, she sometimes works from an 3TB LaCie d2 Quadra external drive. Would it pay to use a SSD or Flash external drive?
 

pigoo3

Well-known member
Staff member
Admin
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
44,213
Reaction score
1,424
Points
113
Location
U.S.
Your Mac's Specs
2017 15" MBP, 16gig ram, 1TB SSD, OS 10.15
To avoid clogging up the hard drive, she sometimes works from an 3TB LaCie d2 Quadra external drive.

Always a great idea.:)

Would it pay to use a SSD or Flash external drive?

Not if you're trying to keep costs down (as stated in the thread title).:) Take the £££ you would spend on an external SSD...and invest that £££ into the new computer. If you really want a speed increase...don't get the Fusion drive in the computer (2 examples above)...get an internal SSD. I know the internal SSD's are expensive...and many times you get fewer gig's of storage...but an internal SSD will be MUCH faster than the Fusion drive.:)

- Nick
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top