PaulRanger1, it's not heresy. But it also should not be reassuring to you. Avast (or any other antivirus package) will occasionally find a virus, or infection in your email or on a website. But the point is that NONE of those viruses or infections can affect your Mac. All Avast, or any other AV package, can find are Windows viruses because there are, at this time, none out there for the Mac for it to find. So Avast dutifully reports to you that it found something (it did), but what it found cannot affect you. So, is that discovery of something that cannot affect you in any way useful to you? Is it worth the cost of Avast both in terms of dollars and the performance hit you take for it to run?
Here is an analogy--I have a piece of equipment that you can install on a vehicle that will tell you if your gasoline engine is not performing up to par. It's perfect, it works well, exactly as advertised. It does rob you of about 10% of your power to run it, but it will tell you everything that is wrong with your gasoline engine and even offer to fix it for you on the fly. But your car doesn't have a gasoline engine, it has a diesel engine. Would you run it? What benefit would you expect from it?
Viruses are not "said to be non existent" on the Mac, they ARE nonexistent at this time. And Avast won't find the first one to appear because Avast won't know what to look for, it doesn't exist.Avast finds viruses that have already been found, by looking for the signature of the virus. The first macOS virus will be a "zero Day" virus because until it appears, nobody know what that signature will be.
Bottom line, get rid of Avast, you'll be better off in the long run. If and when a virus DOES appear for macOS, you can then get whatever you want. In the meantime, Avast is only finding Windows viruses for you. Interesting, but not useful.