- Joined
- Jul 2, 2013
- Messages
- 653
- Reaction score
- 12
- Points
- 18
- Location
- southern Arizona
- Your Mac's Specs
- 2018 MacBook Pro, 15", i9, 32GB RAM, Monterey
I am old enough to be retired, but my eyes are still pretty good and my eyesight has not changed much from when I was a young child. I have always been a bit far sighted, even as an 8 year old, and I need glasses for reading, but not for driving. My far vision is about 20/30 and I have no eye problems other than my far-sightedness, but I am sensitive to glare. I would not say that this sensitivity is related to any medical condition as I have had it for as long as I can remember and every optholmologist I have seen has told me that my eyes were healthy and normal, but I understand that the term "normal" infers a range of sensitivity to external stimuli and that people's reactions vary within that range.MikeFromMesa, thanks for the info. I was curious because while I have certainly heard of people complaining about glossy screens before, I'd not heard of any specific eye or medical conditions to label that. I now understand better that this is in part a perception issue, and may be associated with aging eyes or other medical conditions such as a propensity to headaches (and could be triggered by some of the same things that trigger those).
My understanding -- and maybe you've already looked into this -- is that Apple has greatly reduced the glossiness of its screens over the past couple of years, for example:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/macbook-pro-retina-display-only-slightly-less-glossy/
I am not subject to headaches but do get them occasionally when trying to use a high gloss screen. In short my eyes are normal, but subject to the same range of variations as all humans and my problem is a heightened sensitivity to glare.
I had not heard about Apple reducing the glare on their screens (and that may mean that this problem with glare is much more widespread than I previously thought and not just for people with some "medical condition") and that is of some importance to me. If they have done so with the iMac that might be a solution to my problem so I will look into that. Thank you for the information. My MBP is still working relatively well and I had not spent too much time looking into a replacement (other than checking out the specs on the Apple website) but this information will probably spur me into checking it out a bit more. My MBP has a quad core i7 and I would not want a slower chip than that in a new computer.
Last edited: