Hi Guys,
My biggest requirement is for as many "portable pixels" as I can get. (I often don't have access to a 2nd monitor and I'm on the move a lot.)
The retina displays at 1920 x 1200 are just a bit too tiny for my eyes.
So I'm comparing various versions of used 17"ers:
core duo (5,2) vs. i5 (6,1) vs. i7 (6,1?) vs. i7 (8,3)
From what I can tell by looking at benchmarks, there are only incremental changes in performance until you get to the quad core (8,3).
I don't do much in the way of cpu-intensive stuff (no video editing ), but I DO like to have many Apps and windows running at the same time.
So I'm wondering if maybe a 5,2 or a 6,1 with lots of RAM would be good "bang for the buck" or if I really should spend the extra $500 to get the quad core? Or maybe there are other compelling reasons to spend that extra $500?
Thanks!
My biggest requirement is for as many "portable pixels" as I can get. (I often don't have access to a 2nd monitor and I'm on the move a lot.)
The retina displays at 1920 x 1200 are just a bit too tiny for my eyes.
So I'm comparing various versions of used 17"ers:
core duo (5,2) vs. i5 (6,1) vs. i7 (6,1?) vs. i7 (8,3)
From what I can tell by looking at benchmarks, there are only incremental changes in performance until you get to the quad core (8,3).
I don't do much in the way of cpu-intensive stuff (no video editing ), but I DO like to have many Apps and windows running at the same time.
So I'm wondering if maybe a 5,2 or a 6,1 with lots of RAM would be good "bang for the buck" or if I really should spend the extra $500 to get the quad core? Or maybe there are other compelling reasons to spend that extra $500?
Thanks!