I'm looking for a smaller, lighter laptop to replace my MacBook Pro 15" system - passing my current system on to a colleague at work.
At my local Apple store,I've looked side-by-side at 13" Air, Pro and Pro with Retna. I cannot see any difference in the screen display quality between the three, so I'm not necessarily convinced paying more for Retna is money well spent. I've always thought my non-Retna 15" Pro display was excellent.
I noticed, though, that the Pro with Retna is significantly lighter than the non-Retna model; only about a 1/2 pound heavier than the Air (3.57lbs vs 2.96lbs). I assume this is attributable to the absence of a DVD drive, which the Air doesn't have either.
The Air has a slightly larger foot print, but looks like it allows a little more space for your hands while typing.
It's possible to configure these systems very comparably - in terms of processors, RAM, solid state drives and so-forth.
Can anyone suggest some reasons for choosing one over the other, or is this really just a matter of user preference?
Thank you.
At my local Apple store,I've looked side-by-side at 13" Air, Pro and Pro with Retna. I cannot see any difference in the screen display quality between the three, so I'm not necessarily convinced paying more for Retna is money well spent. I've always thought my non-Retna 15" Pro display was excellent.
I noticed, though, that the Pro with Retna is significantly lighter than the non-Retna model; only about a 1/2 pound heavier than the Air (3.57lbs vs 2.96lbs). I assume this is attributable to the absence of a DVD drive, which the Air doesn't have either.
The Air has a slightly larger foot print, but looks like it allows a little more space for your hands while typing.
It's possible to configure these systems very comparably - in terms of processors, RAM, solid state drives and so-forth.
Can anyone suggest some reasons for choosing one over the other, or is this really just a matter of user preference?
Thank you.