The Intel Imac experiment- A real test

Joined
Dec 1, 2005
Messages
169
Reaction score
4
Points
18
Hi All

Righto I have decided to do a small test.

I have replaced my Imac G5 Isight with a 17inch Intel Dual Core, (IDC) to save my typing.

The IDC will be coming in 3 days time, I will be ordering the IDC with the standard 512mb ram as compared to my current 1GB setup.

I shall time application startups and see what the differences are and then report back- this will hopefully give people a real world comparison as opposed to 2-3X claims lol.

If we can make a list of programs that you all use I will if i have them try and replicate real world scenarios- clocking the speeds!

Watch this space, should be interesting!
 
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
9,065
Reaction score
331
Points
83
Location
Munich
Your Mac's Specs
Aluminium Macbook 2.4 Ghz 4GB RAM, SSD 24" Samsung Display, iPhone 4, iPad 2
Cool, can't wait for real-world results...
I'll be doing the same at work when the new models arrive...
They should start arriving in stores here in Germany next week according to Apple.
 
Joined
Oct 11, 2004
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Your Mac's Specs
Unibody MBP 2.53, 4Gigs Ram, 320 HD, Snow Leopard, 500 Gig Time Capsule, 32 Gig White 3GS
Sounds great
Try these progs:
Illustrator
Photoshop
Dreamweaver
Entourage
Itunes
 
Joined
Mar 3, 2005
Messages
46
Reaction score
1
Points
8
The RAM difference is going to play a large factor and make it difficult to truely compare. If you have 2 sticks of ram in the G5, you might want to remove one, leaving 512MB so that they are on the same level.
 
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
3,378
Reaction score
61
Points
48
Load times will be limited by the hard drive mostly, they will both have similar 7200rpm 3.5in drives. I wouldn't expect to see a huge difference because of that.
 
B

BEEEsH

Guest
I think the only accurate tests you could possibly do are ilife'06 and iwork'06 comparisions. How fair is it compare two systems (using photoshop for example) when a program is developed specifically for one, while the other requires the use of rosetta to run properly?

The iproducts are universal (being they run natively in either OS) so it would be fair. (unless there is software that is already available that is developed for both versions)
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2004
Messages
10,345
Reaction score
597
Points
113
Location
Margaritaville
Your Mac's Specs
3.4 Ghz i7 MacBook Pro (2015), iPad Pro (2014), iPhone Xs Max. Apple TV 4K
Try booting a Windows XP disk. Not installing, just see if you can boot from an Install CD/DVD...
 
Joined
Jan 12, 2005
Messages
1,278
Reaction score
13
Points
38
Location
/home/sheffield/UK
Your Mac's Specs
12" 1Ghz PB 768Mb 10.4.5 30Gb Video iPod 40Gb 3G iPod 1Gb iPod Shuffle
damontgo said:
try iMovie and FCP as well if you can

FCP wont work apple said that at the key note and the universal version isnt out yet
 
G

Grumplebits

Guest
BEEEsH said:
I think the only accurate tests you could possibly do are ilife'06 and iwork'06 comparisions. How fair is it compare two systems (using photoshop for example) when a program is developed specifically for one, while the other requires the use of rosetta to run properly?

I for one would still like to know how Photoshop performs with Rosetta, in comparison to the native performance on a G5. I was planning on buying an iMac G5 but now I'm wondering if I should maybe opt for the Intel Dual Core instead. I use Photoshop a lot and there's no telling when Adobe will release a Universal version, so Smartz... PLEASE test it with Photoshop. I would really appreciate hearing the results and your opinion. :yinyang:
 
OP
S
Joined
Dec 1, 2005
Messages
169
Reaction score
4
Points
18
RIGHT TIME FOR THE RESULTS

The Intel Mac arrived today at lunch. It is a 17 inch 512mb dual core. Compare to my G5 with 512mb - i took out the additonal stick to make the tests fairer.

First impressions are the Intel machine boots a fraction faster than the G5, I would conservatively put it at around 5 seconds faster, however not as fast as shown on a video doing the rounds on the net but indeed it is faster.

The first test I applied to the machine was to open photoshop and see how long it took each machine to fully open it.

The G5 machine opened this program in around 25 seconds
The intel machine opened this program in around 11 seconds.

Ilife 06 was placed on both machines and run.
The G5 machine opened this program in around 18 seconds
The intel machine opened this program in around 06 seconds.

I decided to test the machine using illustrator and a brochure I had put together which was 56 pages long with some very high res images in it.
The G5 machine opened the file after 16 seconds, and the Intel machine did this in 5 seconds, however the Intel machine allowed me to grab and scroll the document with no delay whilst the G5 machine was a bit more jerky.

I enjoy watching quicktime movie trailers on my Imac and found that whilst I could watch hi- res trailers there. I ran a test on The Xmen 3 HD trailer. The G5 Imac played up to 720p with no slowdowns or problems at all. When going to the next level 1080p trailer the G5 had problems even with 1gb system ram installed, the sound played but lost synch with the video as a lag slowly crept in. The intel machine played the 1080p with 512mb without a single hitch, the playback was fluid and uninterrupted.

Back to photoshop, and Indesign CS2 I found that Intel machine was on a par with the G5 but weirdly in certain functions the intel machine would blow the G5 away, certain brush and effects when applied suing the Intel would speed through instantly, where as the G5 would be 3-10 seconds behind in some cases.

Office proved to be very interesting as in my tests there was no difference at all, the load times varied by a second or two but nothing massively, and these would change around each instance, the only program I found to have what i would consider a noticable effect was Word. When a word docuemtn laden with images was opened on the Intel machine it did so with no delay, in the past there had been a 1-5 second delay but i had attributed this to down to the hard drive. Could this be due to the original powerpoint presentation being created on a Pc who knows.

One thing that is for sure is that the Intel machine comes with some nicer packaging, the manual, remote and documents come in a sexy slide box which was a plastic bag affair with my G5.

I cannot say enough about Rossetta, its like omni-present. If it is there and working you certainly dont notice, I will be interested to see how some of my game slike Roller Coaster Tycoon 3 run on the machine but generally across the board the Intel is either the same or faster. When native universal versions of the core mac programs appear like Adobe CS3 and Office I think we will see a huge speed jump!
 
Joined
Oct 25, 2004
Messages
201
Reaction score
1
Points
18
Location
Toronto, Canada
Your Mac's Specs
13.3" 2.26 GHz MBP, 2GB RAM, 640GB HD
wow! from what you have reported there are substantial speed increases with the intel chips. i do wonder if the intel chips run cooler than the g5 processors?
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
790
Reaction score
13
Points
18
Location
Legoland
Cool. I have a few questions that maybe you could also answer.

1. Does the new machine make less noise that the old one. (as in fan noise after a while of operation)

2. Can you dual boot with windows.

Thanks.
 

rman


Retired Staff
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
12,637
Reaction score
168
Points
63
Location
Los Angeles, California
Your Mac's Specs
14in MacBook Pro M1 Max 32GB 2TB
Mr Bobbins said:
2. Can you dual boot with windows.

An article in Ars Technica says you can not at this time. The article has been posted several places on this site. :)
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
790
Reaction score
13
Points
18
Location
Legoland
rman said:
An article in Ars Technica says you can not at this time. The article has been posted several places on this site. :)

Yes, I got to that just after I'd posted the request. No windows for now, would have been interesting to mess around with but in no way essential (not for me anyway). No doubt someone will make a hack for it, in time.
 
OP
S
Joined
Dec 1, 2005
Messages
169
Reaction score
4
Points
18
Hi there all, having played around with the machine som more I have found some slight slowdown with the adobe applications. In particular these take some additional time to boot witht he spinning beach ball keep appearing!

I shall continue using my machine over the space of the week and give a more detailed review. The Intel machine is ultra quiet, compared to my G5 it is silent, also the intel machine has a stronger magnet holding the remote in place! That and a mini DVI on the rear are my first major notices!
 
Joined
Oct 5, 2005
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Location
Maine
Your Mac's Specs
iMac G5, 20"- 2.1.Processor, 1.5 G Ram
Macs will now be junk.............Like PC's.
Guess Ya'll gunna have to go Unix...........
I am glad I got my iMac G5 without the intel junk chip......
My iMac G5 runs great with out no noise............
Hope it keeps up........
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2004
Messages
10,345
Reaction score
597
Points
113
Location
Margaritaville
Your Mac's Specs
3.4 Ghz i7 MacBook Pro (2015), iPad Pro (2014), iPhone Xs Max. Apple TV 4K
Please explain that earltash. Are you saying that they will simply be junk becasue of the intel chip?
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
790
Reaction score
13
Points
18
Location
Legoland
earltash said:
Macs will now be junk.............Like PC's.
Guess Ya'll gunna have to go Unix...........
I am glad I got my iMac G5 without the intel junk chip......
My iMac G5 runs great with out no noise............
Hope it keeps up........

Have you been drinking that duff beer again...Homer !! :p
 

Shop Amazon


Shop for your Apple, Mac, iPhone and other computer products on Amazon.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
Top